fosstodon.org is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
Fosstodon is an invite only Mastodon instance that is open to those who are interested in technology; particularly free & open source software. If you wish to join, contact us for an invite.

Administered by:

Server stats:

9.8K
active users

#wpath

0 posts0 participants0 posts today

Nie minął tydzień od ostatniego ataku na Łukasza Sakowskiego że ośmiela się krytykować super profesjonalną niezależną medyczną organizację #WPATH, a na jaw wyszła historia nacisków ze strony szefów WPATH na „niezależne” przeglądy badań i politycznych nacisków rządu USA na kształt zaleceń.

economist.com/united-states/20

The Economist · Research into trans medicine has been manipulatedBy The Economist

Genspect und SEGM sind jetzt als LGBTQ-Hassgruppen von der Bürgerrechtsorganisation SPLC eingeordnet worden.
SEGM-Mitglieder und Mitarbeiter waren Teil einer verdeckten Beratungsgruppe für den #CASS-Review in England und sind in die #WPATH Files verstrickt. Genspect und SEGM vertreten weltweit erfolgreich eine zutiefst transfeindliche Agenda.
#trans #transgender

erininthemorning.com/p/splc-de

Erin In The Morning · SPLC Designates Genspect, SEGM As Anti-LGBTQ Hate GroupsBy Erin Reed
Fact Check: 216 Instances Of Factual Errors Found In Right-Wing "WPATH Files" Document
On Monday, anti-trans groups released a set of highly editorialized and decontextualized leaks dubbed the "WPATH Files." A fact check reveals 216 errors, misrepresentations, and faulty citations.
erininthemorning.com/p/fact-ch…
#transgender #wpath #lgbtq #transphobia #trans #wpathfiles
Erin In The Morning · Fact Check: 216 Instances Of Factual Errors Found In Right-Wing "WPATH Files" DocumentBy Erin Reed

So, over on Xitter, Michael Shellenberger has released the ominously named #WPATHFiles as part of a supposed exposé of the nefariousness of #WPATH.

A quick scan through his first tranche of material looks a whole lot like a carefully curated bunch of discussions between professionals asking complex questions - but they have been removed from substantive context in order to make the things look as bad as possible.

This isn’t investigative journalism, and Genspect seems to be in the middle.