fosstodon.org is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
Fosstodon is an invite only Mastodon instance that is open to those who are interested in technology; particularly free & open source software. If you wish to join, contact us for an invite.

Administered by:

Server stats:

10K
active users

#greenOA

1 post1 participant0 posts today
(((@amarois)))<p>[Veille] J'étais passé à côté : "Proposer un preprint à @peercommunityin.bsky.social : c’est possible maintenant dès le formulaire de dépôt HAL" (01/2024)=&gt; <a href="https://www.ccsd.cnrs.fr/2024/01/proposer-un-preprint-a-peer-community-in-c-est-possible-maintenant-des-le-formulaire-de-depot-hal/" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">ccsd.cnrs.fr/2024/01/proposer-</span><span class="invisible">un-preprint-a-peer-community-in-c-est-possible-maintenant-des-le-formulaire-de-depot-hal/</span></a> <br><a href="https://mamot.fr/tags/HAL" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>HAL</span></a> <a href="https://mamot.fr/tags/openaccess" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>openaccess</span></a> <a href="https://mamot.fr/tags/greenOA" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>greenOA</span></a> <a href="https://mamot.fr/tags/preprints" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>preprints</span></a> <a href="https://mamot.fr/tags/PeerCommunityIn" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>PeerCommunityIn</span></a> <a href="https://mamot.fr/tags/openpeerreviewing" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>openpeerreviewing</span></a> <a href="https://mamot.fr/tags/openscience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>openscience</span></a> <a href="https://mamot.fr/tags/openrepositories" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>openrepositories</span></a></p>
Georg Krammer<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://scholar.social/@englandjonathan" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@<span>englandjonathan</span></a></span> <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@OpenAIRE" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@<span>OpenAIRE</span></a></span> </p><p>Nice poll, looking forward to the answer!</p><p>Especially interested, as some large grant foundations (e.g. Bill &amp; Melinda Gates) have already made the logical transition to Green Open Access. </p><p>=&gt; no more grant money for APCs!<br># Don't feed the major publishers :)</p><p><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/OpenAccess" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>OpenAccess</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/greenOA" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>greenOA</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/green" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>green</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/APC" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>APC</span></a></p>
petersuber<p>Update. Here's an unrefereed letter to the editor leaving the false impression that the UK <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/REF" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>REF</span></a> requires researchers to publish in <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/APC" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>APC</span></a>-based <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/OpenAccess" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>OpenAccess</span></a> journals. (It doesn't require publishing in OA journals; authors may choose <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/GreenOA" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>GreenOA</span></a> instead; and when they do choose to publish in OA journals, they are free to choose no-APC or <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/DiamondOA" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>DiamondOA</span></a> journals.) <br><a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41415-025-8398-8" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">nature.com/articles/s41415-025</span><span class="invisible">-8398-8</span></a></p>
Zack Batist<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://fediscience.org/@petersuber" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@<span>petersuber</span></a></span> Excellent! Love the <a href="https://archaeo.social/tags/GreenOA" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>GreenOA</span></a> model!</p><p>Now let's see greater investment in infrastructures to support this policy and more detailed consideration of research outputs that aren't journal articles</p>
petersuber<p>Kudos to <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Canada" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Canada</span></a>'s three major research-funding agencies for their draft all-green, zero-embargo, rights-retention <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/OpenAccess" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>OpenAccess</span></a> policy.<br><a href="https://science.gc.ca/site/science/en/interagency-research-funding/policies-and-guidelines/open-access/draft-revised-tri-agency-open-access-policy-publications" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">science.gc.ca/site/science/en/</span><span class="invisible">interagency-research-funding/policies-and-guidelines/open-access/draft-revised-tri-agency-open-access-policy-publications</span></a></p><p>The agencies are the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (<a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/CIHR" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>CIHR</span></a>), the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (<a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/NSERC" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>NSERC</span></a>) and the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (<a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/SSHRC" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>SSHRC</span></a>) — sometimes known collectively as the <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/TriAgency" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>TriAgency</span></a>.</p><p><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Copyright" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Copyright</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Embargoes" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Embargoes</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/GreenOA" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>GreenOA</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/OpenLicenses" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>OpenLicenses</span></a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/RightsRetention" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>RightsRetention</span></a></p>
Replied in thread

@neuralreckoning @internetarchive
Sorry if you already know this. The #NelsonMemo described #GreenOA policies. It required deposit in OA #repositories, not submission to OA #journals. Some publishers told authors that they'd have to pay #APCs to comply with the policy. But that was deception and spin. Compliance with the policy was always free of charge. When journals charge APCs to publish fed-funded research, it was to publish in those journals, not to comply with federal policy.

New study: "Despite having a #repository mandate since 2016, #NSF #compliance rates remain low."
iastatedigitalpress.com/jlsc/a

Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly CommunicationOpen But Hidden: Open Access Gaps in the National Science Foundation Public Access RepositoryIntroduction: In 2022, the U.S. government released new guidelines for making publicly funded research open and available. For the National Science Foundation (NSF), these policies reinforce requirements in place since 2016 for supported research to be submitted to the Public Access Repository (PAR). Methods: To evaluate the public access compliance of research articles submitted to the NSF-PAR, this study searched for NSF-PAR records published between 2017 and 2021 from two research intensive institutions. Records were reviewed to determine whether the PAR held a deposited copy, as required by the 2016 policies, or provided a link out to publisher-held version(s). Results: A total of 841 unique records were identified, all with publicly accessible versions. Yet only 42% had a deposited PDF version available in the repository as required by the NSF 2016 Public Access Policy. The remaining 58% directed instead to publisher-held versions. In total, only 55% of record links labeled “Full Text Available” directed users to a publicly accessible version with a single click. Discussion: Records within PAR do not clearly direct users to the publicly accessible full text. In almost half of records, the most prominently displayed link directed users to a paywall version, even when a publicly available version existed. Records accessible only through the CHORUS (Clearing House for the Open Research of the United States) initiative were further obscured by requiring specialized navigation of publisher-owned sites. Conclusion: Despite having a repository mandate since 2016, NSF compliance rates remain low. Additional support and/or oversight is needed to address the additional requirements introduced under the 2022 memo.

Good news from the US Repository Network (#USRN):
sparcopen.org/wp-content/uploa

"At the beginning of the project, about half of the #repositories did not have their #OAIPMH interface properly configured and, therefore, could not be indexed by external discovery systems. After just over a year of the pilot, all but one repositories are now OAI-PMH compliant. This has resulted in a 50% increase in indexed content, with 728,770 new records now publicly accessible."

Continued thread

Update with a comment.

Don't throw in the towel. First, reform research #assessment to move away from journal impact factors (#JIFs) and to pay more attention to the quality of research than the number of publications or where they published. Second, move away from #APCs. To make research #OpenAccess, favor no-APC #GreenOA and #DiamondOA over APC-based varieties.

BTW, the Budapest Open Access Initiative 20th anniversary statement makes both these recommendations. (Disclosure: I was a co-author.)
budapestopenaccessinitiative.o

www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.orgBOAI20 – Budapest Open Access Initiative

New study: "Articles authored or co-authored by employees of the [US] National Cancer Institute [are in the #PublicDomain but frequently] omit any assertion of public domain status, and…many of them remain inaccessible to the general public behind publisher firewalls. Medical institutional #repositories and libraries can play an important role in making this literature (both current and historical) more widely available."
scholarlycommons.henryford.com

Henry Ford Health Scholarly CommonsAuthorship of articles by U.S. Government employees: implications and opportunities for medical institutional repositoriesArticles authored or co-authored by U.S. Government employees are generally in the public domain. The emerging National Institutes of Health Draft Public Access Policy, part of the 2022 OSTP memo "Ensuring Free, Immediate, and Equitable Access to Federally Funded Research," aligns with this spirit of copyright legislation regarding such articles. This presentation will share results from a recent study on the copyright labeling practices and open access status of articles authored or co-authored by employees of the National Cancer Institute. The study found that it is not uncommon for these articles to omit any assertion of public domain status, and that many of them remain inaccessible to the general public behind publisher firewalls. Medical institutional repositories and libraries can play an important role in making this literature (both current and historical) more widely available. However, there are complexities to consider, including issues related to co-authorship, international copyright, contractual override, library licensing, and downstream transformative uses such as generative artificial intelligence harvesting.

📢 Blogpost: Wie ergänzen sich #GreenOA und #DiamondOpenAccess und welche Chancen bietet das für nachhaltiges wissenschaftliches Publizieren? Im neuesten Blogbeitrag fassen Enrique Corredera Nilsson und Daniela Hahn die Highlights eines Webinars zusammen und diskutieren, wie diese Modelle Bibliodiversität und Zugänglichkeit fördern können.🌱💎
👉 open-access.network/blog/when-

Passend dazu empfehlen wir noch eine Podiumsdiskussion zur #OAWeek zu GreenOA in der Schweiz:
openaccessweek.ub.unibas.ch/en
#OpenAccess