Much of what is commonly said about #email and #openpgp is wrong. It can very well be fast and secure and that's a claim backed by working code and deployments and audits (#chatmail servers and the #deltachat family of apps). There is no both-sides-have-opinions game to be played here. Internet-scale messaging alternatives are arguably either centralized or brittle. There is however much room for further improvements including deep changes in how we commonly understand email today. Stay tuned :)
@delta when post quantum encryption?
@ejim No ETA, but work on post-quantum encryption for OpenPGP is in progress at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-openpgp-pqc/, eventually it gets standardized and implemented in rPGP, so it will be possible to generate PQ keys.
@delta @ejim it'll be interesting to see, how the OpenPGP schism plays out in the long run. Right now it looks like there might be two competing, almost identical PQC drafts, one from GnuPG (LibrePGP) and one from BSI/MTG/Proton (https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-openpgp-pqc-06.html).
@vanitasvitae @ejim we are mostly engaged with OpenPGP players because this is where multi-party collaboration happens today, including advances on various specs, discussing questions etc. We experience discussions there as in good faith. People listen to each other and move jointly. The whole point of standardization is to have multi-party agreements and compliant implementations, after all.