fosstodon.org is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
Fosstodon is an invite only Mastodon instance that is open to those who are interested in technology; particularly free & open source software. If you wish to join, contact us for an invite.

Administered by:

Server stats:

9.8K
active users

#doddfrank

0 posts0 participants0 posts today
Continued thread

On Tuesday, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Community Financial Services Association of America.

The case is a challenge to the funding mechanism that Congress set up for the CFPB when it created the consumer-finance watchdog agency as part of the Dodd-Frank financial reforms in 2011.

Unlike some other federal agencies that receive annual appropriations from lawmakers, Congress allows the CFPB to draw its funding directly from an account in the Federal Reserve System.

Congress has allowed federal agencies to receive funding from a variety of different sources, and it retains the power to change those arrangements whenever it sees fit.

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals disagreed. Judge Cory Wilson, writing for a unanimous three-judge panel, described the funding mechanism as a violation of the appropriations clause as well as a blow to the separation of powers.

“Even among self-funded agencies, the Bureau is unique,” Wilson claimed, quoting from precedent. “The Bureau’s perpetual self-directed, double-insulated funding structure goes a significant step further than that enjoyed by the other agencies on offer. And none of the agencies cited above ‘wields enforcement or regulatory authority remotely comparable to the authority the [Bureau] may exercise throughout the economy.’”

Wilson’s opinion echoed the widespread belief in the conservative legal movement that the CFPB is a dangerous threat to liberty and must be either reined in or destroyed.

The Supreme Court’s conservative majority, which appears similarly skeptical of the consumer-finance watchdog, previously dismantled the statutory for-cause protections for the CFPB’s director in 2018.

In one notable exchange on Capitol Hill, a Republican lawmaker from Pennsylvania told CFPB Director Rohit Chopra during a congressional hearing earlier this year that the financial industry was not happy with the agency’s work and urged her to “be responsive to the clientele that you’re supposed to be helping” when adopting new policies and regulations.

“Just to be clear, the clientele of the CFPB is not banks,” Chopra responded. “The clientele is the public"
#cfpb #scotus #doddfrank #fed
newrepublic.com/article/175899

The New Republic · The Supreme Court Eyes Its Next Big Power GrabTwo cases this term might cement a new order of judicial supremacy—and end the idea of a government by “We the People.”
Replied in thread

@GottaLaff what could be done is #potus invokes #14thamendment and then uses a #doddfrank defense of the economy as justification to allow the #federalreserve to continue funding the government until the budget impasse has been addressed. It was #congress that authorized #doddfrank to allow the #federalreserve to inject money directly into the economy without congressional oversight, and it has since 2010. This action would only fund obligations Congress lawfully incurred.

Who can bankroll enough lobbying to actually change federal law?

Banks. $400M+ in 2 years:

"the banking lobby worked for two years to water down aspects of the 2010 Dodd-Frank law...with companies and trade groups that specifically mention Idaho Senator Mike Crapo’s legislation spending more than $400 million in 2017 and 2018, according to an Associated Press analysis of the public lobbying disclosures"
apnews.com/article/banking-cri
--
#Congress #corruption #banking #finance #DoddFrank #crapo

AP News · Lobbyists pushed changes blamed for contributing to collapse of Silicon Valley Bank and Signature BankBy Brian Slodysko

Tell President Biden (via Public Citizen): The failures of Silicon Valley Bank & Signature Bank are stark reminders (that could have been prevented) of what we already learned from the 2008 financial meltdown. We urge you to direct the relevant agencies in your administration to at long last finalize the Dodd-Frank executive compensation rule without further delay.

#DoddFrank #PublicCitizen #Petition

publiccitizen.salsalabs.org/bi

#Senators Aren’t Ready to Blame Themselves for #SiliconValleyBank Implosion theintercept.com/2023/03/15/si

2018 #deregulation bill: #Senate #Bill2155 — curbed parts of the #DoddFrank Act that forced #banks to lend responsibly, hold adequate cash on hand, and conduct stress tests to ensure the liquidity required to prevent a run. Removing oversight on banks holding $50 billion in assets to banks holding over $250 billion.

The InterceptSenators Aren’t Ready to Blame Themselves for Silicon Valley Bank ImplosionBy Daniel Boguslaw

#DoddFrank is NOT #GlassSteagall
.
Dodd-Frank is not going to prevent future crisis, and will be subject to being degraded, because that’s what it’s designed for.
.
Glass-Steagall was enacted in 1933 separating investment banking from commercial banking until Clinton signed its repeal in 1999.
.
Dodd-Frank is fiddling still letting banks gamble w/deposits
#SVB #banking #banjs #economy

billmoyers.com/content/glass-s

BillMoyers.comGlass-Steagall, Dodd-Frank and The Volcker Rule: A Primer and Resources | BillMoyers.comLearn what you need to know about these financial reform legislative milestones.

' [The bill] would repeal the centerpiece of a law passed ... by the Republican-led Congress in 2018, which eased Dodd-Frank financial regulations on midsize banks ...

The Warren-Porter bill would restore the [$50 billion asset] threshold established in 2010 for enhanced capital requirements and stress tests in an attempt to prevent future failures like those at SVB and Signature Bank last week. '

#BankFailures #ElizabethWarren #KatiePorter #DoddFrank #TooBigToFail

nbcnews.com/politics/congress/

NBC NewsSVB collapse: Warren and Porter unveil bill to repeal Trump bank lawBy Sahil Kapur

What Katie Porter rightly had to say about the #SVB debacle on the birdsite:

"The collapse of Silicon Valley Bank was totally avoidable. In 2018, Wall Street pushed a deregulation bill that allowed banks like SVB to take reckless risks. It passed, even as I and many others warned of the risks. I am writing legislation to reverse that law."

Between 2015 & 2018 (passage of "GOP's" rollback legislation) SVB spent more than $500,000 to lobby/ bribe/ coerce Members of Congress to implement the deregulation that let SVB fuck up its own business.

#SiliconValleyBank #SVB #RiskyInvestments #DoddFrank #GOPSabotage #TrumpCorruption #IncompetentGOP #Corruption #AmericaDeservesBetter #Democracy #WeCanDoThis
commondreams.org/news/trump-er

Common DreamsTrump-Era Deregulation Deemed a Key Culprit in Failure of Silicon Valley Bank"President Trump and congressional Republicans' decision to roll back Dodd-Frank's 'too big to fail' rules for banks like SVB—reducing both oversight and capital requirements—contributed to a costly collapse," said Sen. Elizabeth Warren.

The failure of #SiliconValleyBank is a direct result of 2018 bank deregulation bill signed by #TraitorTrump 5yrs ago the Republican Director of the Congressional Budget Office released a report finding that this legislation would increase the likelihood that a large financial firm with assets of between $100 billion & $250 billion would fail 17 Democrats joined a unanimous Senate Republican conference to pass it clearing the House 258-159, winning 225 Republicans & 33 Democrats. #DoddFrank