Aprende desde cero a usar esta herramienta poderosa, con ejemplos y buenas prácticas. Lee la publicación completa en nuestro foro y empieza a explorar: https://tinyurl.com/2yeazvj4
Recent searches
Search options
#Crossref
0 posts0 participants0 posts today
Another #scholia thing which is broken.
https://scholia.toolforge.org/doi/10.1080/03014223.2023.2235288
Not quite sure what the probelm is, maybe a JSON parsing error?
ScholiaScholia
Continued thread
Sitting here with @litvinovg trying to find out why our #VIVO does not import from DOI, but it seems it is the #Crossref API that is not working.
Trying to find all DOIs for a journal, book, or conference? It's a common question with more than one answer. We've shared two practical approaches — and why things aren't always as complete as they seem. Read more: https://bit.ly/3EoyaKY
#crossref #metadata #restapi #ticketofthemonth
This month's Membership Ticket of the Month explains how to get help from Crossref as quickly as possible.
Check if your question has already been answered on our site or forum. If not, contact the right team and include as much detail as possible. Avoid follow-up messages that might slow things down. Read more: https://tinyurl.com/tz7ask29
Are you using Retraction Watch data in your work?
Join us for a webinar on April 2, 2025, and find out how Crossref's new integration makes this easier and more reliable.
Register here: https://tinyurl.com/d88f2sty
Transparency in research takes another step forward. Join our April 2, 2025 webinar to explore Retraction Watch data in Crossref. Find out how it works and why it matters. Register: https://tinyurl.com/tbf8w6u7 #Crossref #publishing #research
Retraction Watch metadata is now available in Crossref's REST API.
Join our upcoming webinar to learn how to access and use this data, with examples from GetFTR.
More info: https://tinyurl.com/d88f2sty
Crossref REST API update: Chapter metadata now shows only chapter-level licenses, not book licenses. This helps clarify license information. Reindexing is in progress. Full community forum post here: https://tinyurl.com/s4murfdb
Crossref community forum · Updates to chapter licenses in the REST APIWe’ve made a change in the REST API that will affect how chapter licenses display: from now on you will only see licenses deposited with the chapter and not those from the corresponding book. In the next few days we will reindex all chapters, so the change will be propagated across all affected records (see Jira for details). Why did we make this change? Book chapters are, of course, part of a book. However, the two are often licensed differently. Previously we have displayed both the license o...
Evaluating #Multilingual #Metadata Quality in #Crossref / Dennis Donathan II, Mike Nason, Marco Tullney, Julie Shi, Juan Pablo Alperin
https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.11853
arXiv.orgEvaluating Multilingual Metadata Quality in CrossrefIntroduction: Scholarly research spans multiple languages, making multilingual metadata crucial for organizing and accessing knowledge across linguistic boundaries. These multilingual metadata already exist and are propagated throughout scholarly publishing infrastructure, but the extent to which they are correctly recorded, or how they affect metadata quality more broadly is little understood.
Methods: Our study quantifies the prevalence of multilingual records across a sample of publisher metadata and offers an understanding of their completeness, quality, and alignment with metadata standards. Utilizing the Crossref API to generate a random sample of 519,665 journal article records, we categorize each record into four distinct language types: English monolingual, non-English monolingual, multilingual, and uncategorized. We then investigate the prevalence of programmatically-detectable errors and the prevalence of multilingual records within the sample to determine whether multilingualism influences the quality of article metadata.
Results: We find that English-only records are still in the vast majority among metadata found in Crossref, but that, while non-English and multilingual records present unique challenges, they are not a source of significant metadata quality issues and, in few instances, are more complete or correct than English monolingual records.
Discussion & Conclusion: Our findings contribute to discussions surrounding multilingualism in scholarly communication, serving as a resource for researchers, publishers, and information professionals seeking to enhance the global dissemination of knowledge and foster inclusivity in the academic landscape.
Ticket of the month! Moving Existing DOIs into your OJS Instance: https://community.crossref.org/t/ticket-of-the-month-february-2025-moving-existing-dois-into-your-ojs-instance/13372 #doi #crossref #totm
Autorisez le lien ORCID/Crossref, ORCID/DataCite et ORCID/HAL pour ajouter vos travaux sur votre profil ORCID : fiche pratique par @virginilang
ZenodoAutorisez le lien ORCID/Crossref, ORCID/DataCite et ORCID/HAL pour ajouter vos travaux sur votre profil ORCIDCette fiche pratique à destination des personnels de recherche détenteurs d'un profil ORCID, a pour objectif d'expliquer comment autoriser le lien entre son ORCID et Crossref, DataCite et HAL. Ces liens permettent : d'ajouter ses travaux de manière automatisée (articles, chapitres, rapports, jeux de données,... ayant un DOI Crossref ou DataCite associés à son identifiant ORCID) d'ajouter ses travaux de manière manuelle (articles, ouvrages, communications, posters, vidéos, logiciels, rapports, thèses, PGD,... présents dans HAL). Mise en forme graphique : Damien Babonnaud (Université de Lorraine, Direction de la Documentation).
New collaborative effort to enrich scholarly metadata:
https://www.cometadata.org/blog/call-to-action-comet
#OpenScience #COMET #CrossRef #Orcid #ROR
COMETCall to Action from the Collaborative Metadata Enrichment Taskforce (COMET) — COMETThrough extensive stakeholder consultation, COMET has identified the critical need for improving PID metadata through community-driven enrichment… COMET now looks to transition this work into a development phase and seeks strategic partners who can provide financial support, technical expertise, and
New DOI prefixes usually increase sequentially, but sometimes they don't—why? February's membership ticket of the month breaks down how Crossref assigns DOI prefixes and why they may not always follow a strict order. Read more here: https://tinyurl.com/4ahur9yj
Replied in thread
@egonw Ah that's smart, retroactively issuing DOIs for URLs which got cited in order to use #CrossRef citation infra.
I'd be curious to see how many outlinks of paywalled publications the #InternetArchive has managed to archive. Can one extract links from the full text with #ISTEX (https://social.numerique.gouv.fr/@InistCNRS/113940816034538571)? Maybe @chipotte knows.
social.numerique.gouv.frCNRS Inist (@InistCNRS@social.numerique.gouv.fr)Attaché : 1 image
Rejoignez l'Inist et le @cnrs par le biais d'un concours interne affecté et venez travailler, en tant que documentaliste, sur #Istex (ouvert aux CDD, CDI et fonctionnaires avec au moins 4 ans de services publics)
détails : https://profilsdemplois.cnrs.fr/profil/index_public_referens?destination=CIAF2025
DOI prefixes are usually assigned in order, but sometimes they take unexpected jumps or appear lower than before. Why? This month's membership ticket of the month explains it: https://tinyurl.com/3v4ycszk
Can Crossref amend its membership terms? The answer is no, but there are exceptions for certain entities. Learn more in our ticket of the month: https://tinyurl.com/c9zz4fct
#crossref #ticketofthemonth #scholarlypublishing #crossreftotm
The Principles of Open Scholarly Infrastructure (POSI) are evolving. A public consultation is now open on proposed updates to ensure the principles continue to meet the needs of the community.
If you work with or support open infrastructure, read our latest blog post to learn more and share your perspective: https://tinyurl.com/2fm6bx4j
www.crossref.orgPOSI 2.0 feedback - CrossrefAs a provider of foundational open scholarly infrastructure, Crossref is an adopter of the Principles of Open Scholarly Infrastructure (POSI). In December 2024 we posted our updated POSI self-assessment. POSI provides an invaluable framework for transparency, accountability, susatinability and community alignment. There are 21 other POSI adopters.
Together, we are now undertaking a public consultation on proposed revisions for a version 2.0 release of the principles, which would update the current version 1.
We've got news! Retraction Watch data is now integrated with Crossref's existing #metadata, allowing #researchers to access retraction information directly through the Crossref REST API. More info in our latest blog post: https://tinyurl.com/3mdju992
www.crossref.orgRetraction Watch retractions now in the Crossref API - CrossrefRetractions and corrections from Retraction Watch are now available in Crossref’s REST API. Back in September 2023, we announced the acquisition of the Retraction Watch database with an ongoing shared service. Since then, they have sent us regular updates, which are publicly available as a csv file. Our aim has always been to better integrate these retractions with our existing metadata, and today we’ve met that goal.
This is the first time we have supplemented our metadata with a third-party data source.