fosstodon.org is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
Fosstodon is an invite only Mastodon instance that is open to those who are interested in technology; particularly free & open source software. If you wish to join, contact us for an invite.

Administered by:

Server stats:

11K
active users

Dan Brown

Elastic's blogpost summarized (sorry):

We open source again! AWS scary! But we friends now! All part of plan, see! (until something similar happens again). Want to influence OSI. Change made because not doing well? No, don't think that, think future!

Reference:

elastic.co/blog/elasticsearch-

Good to see them come back to open source I guess, but there will rightfully be lost trust from users. I hope we don't see them try to pull AGPL related FUD.

Elastic BlogElasticsearch Is Open Source. Again!Elastic announces the return of open source licensing for Elasticsearch and Kibana, adding AGPL as an option alongside existing licenses. This change reinforces our long-standing commitment to open so...

@danb I feel like there is no winning with that argument: when cockroach changed to a more restrictive license, everyone blamed it on a lack of success. so going more open is the same?

and we would not wish anyone a legal dispute with someone as large as amazon; elastic.co/blog/elastic-and-am had to be done but it was not fun

Elastic BlogElastic and Amazon Reach Agreement on Trademark Infringement LawsuitWe’re pleased to share that Elastic and Amazon have resolved the trademark infringement lawsuit related to the term Elasticsearch. Now the only Elasticsearch service on AWS and the AWS Marketplace is ...

@xeraa I'm assuming that's in reference to the success part? I wasn't making an argument, just summarizing how the post read to me (the post pre-empts that but never makes any argument against it, and instead has a bunch of corpo future talk).

If you are switching because of lacking success, I guess that's still good but it does reflect a whim to change based on business/growth goals rather than full ideal/alignment to open source itself, which again can impact trust.

@danb it's a longer-term plan (also because you cannot take something back once it's out under a specific license)
but we are of course still a company that also needs to fund the development :)