Recent searches
Search options
Right or wrong, the feeling I got was that the bar for actions was just raised higher. Now it's not just the CoC committee, you also need a near unanimous vote from the TAB.
@corbet @axboe @jani @brauner Went over the $SOMETHING on other thread, (and previously - this isn't empty whining).
I am glad it was streamlined from the ~weeks it took to do something about Kent (and case not closed), but can be forgiven for feeling adding more barriers might result in further delay.
If it's on order of hours, fine. But that's something new right?
As far as the other thread: you gave some characteristics that you think the process should have, which is fine. But I have not seen a lot of specifics on how such a response could be implemented within our community. I'll say again: suggestions welcome. Nobody feels that they have a real handle on all of this.
(Just to be clear: I'm not involved in the implementation, but I can do my best to ensure that useful ideas are considered.)
@corbet @axboe @jani @brauner There's a character limit on this instance which limits specificity :)
2 simple ones though:
1. Abuse LF staff, get banned from LF events.
2. Refuse to take action requested of you, punishment either extended or escalated.
Surely the community would accept this... Kent refusing to apologise publicly as was asked of him and suffering no consequences for it was to me, very egregious.