fosstodon.org is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
Fosstodon is an invite only Mastodon instance that is open to those who are interested in technology; particularly free & open source software. If you wish to join, contact us for an invite.

Administered by:

Server stats:

11K
active users

I know this is both controversial and brave of me to say, but I really hate the "two-column paper" format. {lastname}%y.pdf why are you like this.

If we lived in the parallel universe where Zefram Cochrane doesn't shoot the Vulcan, this would all just be hypertext! Just HTML with a tasteful stylesheet. Oh, that reference to another paper looks interesting? Just click on it and have a lookaroo

@aeva You know, it's kind of crazy how much everyone has been convinced to give useless citations and/or references. Compare and contrast how many times you've gone through looking up a citation versus clicking a hyperlink.

@TheZouave it's a friction thing. With a hyperlink, I click on it and the information is there. For a paper citation, I have to google the name of the author(s), year, and title, wade through a bunch of paywall seo and then find a dead link to a ~ directory on a university website that now redirects to the a generic page full of pictures of smiling twenty somethings doing group work, try archive.org instead, but it's not archived, and then go back to the seo to fish for a doi identifier and

@TheZouave if I'm lucky, what falls out at the end is pdf with OCR text from a scan of a bad photocopy of paper from the late 20th century, and it is inexplicably partially written in greek.

Janne Moren

@aeva @TheZouave
As a tip: paper authors are usually happy (delighted!) to send you a copy of the paper if you ask. If the citation is somewhat recent you'll at least get a good, crisp pdf, not a third generation photocopy.

But yes, papers are all created for print, not the web. Online repos (biomedcentral, arxiv, journal web sites) often do have a separate list of citations, and sometimes (as for biomedcentral ) links directly to the paper.

@jannem @aeva And yet, the vast majority of papers are sent as a pdf and read on a computer. I understand this is a relic of actual paper journals, but the fact that the standard hasn't updated in the past 30 years to reflect the reality of how the media is viewed is inexcusable.

@TheZouave @aeva
Probably going to change eventually.

But for that to happen you will need a format that is portable in the way a pdf is. You *really* want your own copy of all papers you collect, to put in your reference database. Links to pages are far too unreliable.

Edit: something like epub for papers. It'd have to be *really* good at stuff such as displaying mathematics. And it'd need something special to entice people to make the shift.

@jannem @TheZouave I will give up before I have to cold call email a stranger. "hey sorry I cyber detective stalked you to get your email I swear I'm not a creep I just want your research."

@aeva @TheZouave
Most research is paywalled, often even to other researchers. I have published papers that I myself don't have access to. It's absolutely ridiculous. That's why Sci-hub is thriving for instance.

So it's absolutely normal and expected to ask people for papers. I absolutely understand that it feels awkward if you're not used to it though.

@jannem @TheZouave ok so maybe I'm not understanding your point here but I've heard this advice before and *it's not a solution it's a crappy bandaid*

@aeva @TheZouave
I agree; it *is* a crappy bandaid.

But it's a crappy bandaid that even researchers have done for decades, because all incentives point toward keeping this crappy system and no incentives point away.

Again, the first thing needed would be a modern replacement for pdf *files*, one that does things so much better it's worth the pain of switching. The main audience for papers is other researchers and web pages don't work.