fosstodon.org is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
Fosstodon is an invite only Mastodon instance that is open to those who are interested in technology; particularly free & open source software. If you wish to join, contact us for an invite.

Administered by:

Server stats:

8.6K
active users

#rpkiーclient

0 posts0 participants0 posts today
ティージェーグレェI submitted a Pull Request to update MacPorts' rpki-client to 9.5 here:<br><br><a href="https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/pull/28128" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/pull/28128</a><br><br>GitHub Continuous Integration checks passed!<br><br>Update: Or at least I thought they did?<br><br>Now seeing this error:<br><br>"Creating port index in /Users/runner/work/macports-ports1597/macports-ports1597/ports<br>Adding port net/rpki-client<br>signal interp lost<br>ports/.github/workflows/bootstrap.sh: line 150: 2047 Abort trap: 6 portindex -e<br>Error: Process completed with exit code 134."<br><br>o.O<br><br>From: <a href="https://github.com/artkiver/macports-ports1597/actions/runs/14437970476" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">https://github.com/artkiver/macports-ports1597/actions/runs/14437970476</a><br><br>Even though previously in the GitHub UI, it showed all three checks as green. wtfh? I mean, I <i>hate</i> GitHub and have less than no reason to trust it, but that's a new one, even for me.<br><br>If I check: <a href="https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/pull/28128/checks" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/pull/28128/checks</a><br><br>All is green there too. I am so confused.<br><br>Regardless, it's up to someone else with commit access to merge it.<br><br>Meanwhile, still no assistance regarding my request for help on the MacPorts' patches for OpenSSH 10.0p1/2 for ssh-agent.c and sshd-session.c, but someone else did open another Trac issue regarding OpenSSH's logging (or lack thereof) here:<br><br><a href="https://trac.macports.org/ticket/72345" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">https://trac.macports.org/ticket/72345</a><br><br>Though, they also observe the same behavior with the Apple shipped version, so they pontificate if it may be an issue upstream?<br><br>Ya think?<br><br>Sometimes, I think folks vastly overestimate what "maintainer" means or how much I might be using some of this software or what they expect me to do about it just because it is "assigned" to me.<br><br>For example: I basically do not run sshd on any macOS systems, since I only have Apple laptops which sleep a <i>lot</i> and are absolutely <i>awful</i> as anything that should be a server running daemonized software.<br><br>Did these folks not notice that Apple <i>themselves</i> discontinued their XServe hardware line circa 2004? Or that even their "OS X Server" product was discontinued from the App Store in 2022?<br><br>I guess they missed the memos, couldn't read the room or writing on the wall?<br><br>But then, they observed this in macOS Monterey, which itself is from 2021, so maybe they just prefer livin in the past? I have no idea.<br><br>I am not even sure how to meaningfully reply to that Trac issue.<br><br><a href="https://snac.bsd.cafe?t=rpki" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#RPKI</a> <a href="https://snac.bsd.cafe?t=rpkiーclient" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#rpkiーclient</a> <a href="https://snac.bsd.cafe?t=macports" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#MacPorts</a> <a href="https://snac.bsd.cafe?t=macos" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#macOS</a> <a href="https://snac.bsd.cafe?t=bgp" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#BGP</a> <a href="https://snac.bsd.cafe?t=openbgpd" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#OpenBGPD</a> <a href="https://snac.bsd.cafe?t=opensource" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#OpenSource</a><br>
ティージェーグレェ<p>PR submitted here:</p><p><a href="https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/pull/18513" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">github.com/macports/macports-p</span><span class="invisible">orts/pull/18513</span></a></p><p>CI/build bot checks OK!</p><p>It's up to someone else to merge it.</p><p><a href="https://rap.social/tags/rpki%E3%83%BCclient" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>rpkiーclient</span></a> <a href="https://rap.social/tags/MacPorts" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>MacPorts</span></a> <a href="https://rap.social/tags/OpenBSD" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>OpenBSD</span></a> <a href="https://rap.social/tags/RPKI" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>RPKI</span></a> <a href="https://rap.social/tags/BGP" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>BGP</span></a> <a href="https://rap.social/tags/OpenSource" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>OpenSource</span></a></p>
グレェ「grey」<p>OK so this PR for rpki-client 8.3 is looking good!</p><p><a href="https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/pull/18035" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">github.com/macports/macports-p</span><span class="invisible">orts/pull/18035</span></a></p><p>It's up to someone else to merge it.</p><p><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/rpki%E3%83%BCclient" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>rpkiーclient</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/MacPorts" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>MacPorts</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/OpenBGPD" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>OpenBGPD</span></a></p>
グレェ「grey」<p>Preliminary tests to augmenting the <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/ldns" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ldns</span></a> 1.8.3 <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/MacPorts" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>MacPorts</span></a> Portfile to have <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/LibreSSL" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>LibreSSL</span></a> and <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/OpenSSL" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>OpenSSL</span></a> variants, using <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/rpki%E3%83%BCclient" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>rpkiーclient</span></a>'s Portfile as a reference with tips from @neverpanic going OK so far, hopefully I can prep a PR and submit that soon, which in theory, should at least make the ldns OpenSSH variant happier with either TLS library too.</p><p>Less sure what to do about the kerberos5 variant, but there is already a PR related to that which hopefully will get addressed eventually.</p>
グレェ「grey」<p>With much thanks to <span class="h-card"><a href="https://chaos.social/@neverpanic" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>neverpanic</span></a></span> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/rpki%E3%83%BCclient" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>rpkiーclient</span></a> in <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/MacPorts" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>MacPorts</span></a> has been updated to 8.2!</p><p><a href="https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/pull/17311" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">github.com/macports/macports-p</span><span class="invisible">orts/pull/17311</span></a></p>