Some context for why keeping a blocklist around that disproportionately targets trans people is a very dangerous thing to do right now.
https://www.them.us/story/trump-admin-fbi-trans-nihilistic-violent-extremists-terrorist

Some context for why keeping a blocklist around that disproportionately targets trans people is a very dangerous thing to do right now.
https://www.them.us/story/trump-admin-fbi-trans-nihilistic-violent-extremists-terrorist
A "baseball bat to the face" is the most explicit invocation of an anti-gay hate crime I can imagine.
It is *the* classic form of gay-bashing murder.
These are three different people he has fantasized about gay bashing.
And most of his targets are not white.
From left to right, we have posts about:
- A Black, queer Muslim.
- A disabled gay man.
- A nonbinary Latine person.
All three did nothing but stand up against Ro's queerphobia, transphobia or racism.
Unlike Ro and WelshPixie, I have receipts.
And my receipts make sense. You can read them. They are very detailed.
I am not counting Ro calling random trans women "racist" as evidence.
But the fact that he gets called out on his queerphobia is the only "evidence" he ever has.
You don't just accidentally attack trans women, over and over, in the middle of genocide.
That's something you only do on purpose.
The other side is the queer people that Ro attacks.
Yes Ro experiences racism on fedi. A ton of it.
Mostly from the Nazi instances any responsible admin has already blocked, but a decent amount from tech bros too.
But that's not who Ro attacks.
Ro almost exclusively attacks queer people.
And the people they go after the hardest are trans women and queer people of colour.
Daily random quote out of context from my academic book about Mastodon
I don't go to a podcast's site and expect to be able to search for and see all podcasts. Similarly I shouldn't go to a #SocialWeb server and expect there to be a search there that shows me all the fedi accounts. Nothing about my blog on the open web determines what sites I can visit in a browser (while it can limit who can leave comments etc). Separate our accounts from the creating/consuming tool.
We need to learn some lessons from the most popular forms of decentralized media.
lots of fedi servers have actually moderated my account for NOT #WishingIll on certain folks.
the new #bluesky hubbub could provide us an opportunity to reconsider moderation norms here and show how we're different and better, but "safety first except for the bad people who should be abused and the distinction is obvious" seems to be the popular policy here. my best go-to for censorious lefties is always "so how do we deal with people who think hating Israel is antisemitic"?
If this is correct, why would any server want to federate with a server with that term in their domain name? Shouldn't you assume that their users would intentionally try to annoy your users? Thus making the overall fedi a place most people wouldn't want to spend time in? The politics do not matter. They are welcoming/encouraging the one legal thing we should be trying hardest to deter here. Obviously unwanted mentions. Basically the worst version of spam. #fediblockmeta
just, like, as a general note:
if you're using fediblock to report a single account on an instance, it'd be real helpful to include things like when it was first reported to that instance's moderators, and if you know if they've declined to take action or just haven't gotten to it yet.
because a lot of these posts are about accounts that are suspended before I even see them
Often when I point out antisemitic hate speech on Mastodon.Social, a German person will tell me about the law in Germany and how M.S must remove certain types of hate speech because of the law there.
I get these messages from Germans every couple of weeks.
The problem is that only applies to a very narrow set of posts, and not other forms of antisemitic speech or hate speech generally.
Mastodon.Social complies with the law, but *just* the law.
They can say "We remove hate speech" and then define that as "Whatever German law says is hate speech."
Which to some means "Anything which is not removed must not be hate speech."
If you want to have hate speech removed because it's illegal in Germany, please do so, but let's not fool ourselves that if m.s does this that it means they care about hate speech, Jews, or any other minorities in their moderation.
Caring about legal compliance isn't the same as caring about people.
Whenever I post a Fediantisemitism post, the real question in my mind is about the admin of the server where the post is and whether they'll take the reports seriously.
I feel like that's really the key question, and one that's often lost in the anonymity of an instance.
The moral failure of the account being reported is no longer in question, but the morality of the admin/mods is.
Will they take appropriate action, or will they approve of hate speech (either directly or tacidly).
That's the real question.
proposal for a #FriendlyFederation norm
servers should block another server if they allow their users to harass users on other servers (unwanted mentions) or let their users pollute hashtags (use lots of unrelated tags in order to get unearned attention).
but servers should not block other servers because their users post untrue or offensive stuff, as long as nobody on other servers is tagged.
grow fedi via what worked for the web. open browsing while fighting spam.
We can allow all legal speech (except harassment) on social media if we decentralize and get rid of the ads and corporate algos.
We have decades of experience to know how to do this. It's how the web and email work. We let people browse and post what they want, and we have spam blocking software to address having crap pushed at us. The magic/difference on good social media is the boosts (and that mods are needed for the nuance of non spam abuse).
So tired of these arguments.
The Ancient Greeks understood the difference between the freedom to say anything (#parrhesia) and defending a wide equality in sharing ideas for the public good (#isegoria). Edgelords favor the former but their trolling deters speech, being an attack on the latter. To stand up for democracy and an open culture, we must be harsh towards efforts to force speech on others but gentle with any actions that limit anybody's access to others' speech. #fediblockmeta #SocialWeb
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/12/two-concepts-of-freedom-of-speech/546791/
6 Reflexiones
Evidentemente en estos momentos no estoy bien. La poca paz que tenía aquí se quebró y con esto pienso dejar el fedi por un tiempo, aunque no de manera permanente porque bueno... no tengo a donde más ir.
Yo no busco hacer un contra fediblock y pedir que bloquen a esta persona poque es caer en el juego de "me hicieron ahora yo hago". Mi trabajo me ha costado salir de esa clase de actitudes de niño chiquito.
Yo soy de la idea de que si se quiere que el fediverso en su conjunto sea un lugar pluricultural, de interacciones sanas y de provecho no se consigue mediante intimación, amenazas y acoso. Se hace fomentando el diálogo, las acciones inclusivas como el fomentar poner los alts, evitar 'doomposting', traer algo de humor sin dejar de lado a los que publican y comparten temas más serios.
El fedi es un lugar bonito, aunque hoy no lo ha sido para mi.
Si leíste todo este chorote, gracias.
#fediblockmeta
Limit accounts on your fedi server to whoever for whatever reasons, but do not fediblock other servers unless their admins allow illegality or fail to police their users from harassing users on other servers (unwanted tagging) or polluting hashtags (using irrelevant tags just to get their posts widely seen).
That's the norm I want on #SocialWeb to maximize dialog. It's only possible here cause our lack of algos means junk can be posted (like on many websites) but never seen. #fediblockmeta
Es encantador ver en los bloqueos de instancias ("desfederación" en jerga fediversal) el estado de guerra "fría" en que se ha sumido nuestro mundo. ¡Un telón de acero divide al panóptico digital!
(Resulta ser de papel higiénico, con más agujeros que un colador, etc: contrabandear datos es más sencillo que robarle los caramelos a un niño, está al alcance incluso de otro niño.)
Amplío: me refiero al mundo de ahí afuera, no sólo a esta red de nerds, hippies y desviades. Sí, las redes reflejan el mundo "real" y todas las cualidades de la gente que lo habitamos, ¿¡quién lo hubiera dicho!?