fosstodon.org is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
Fosstodon is an invite only Mastodon instance that is open to those who are interested in technology; particularly free & open source software. If you wish to join, contact us for an invite.

Administered by:

Server stats:

8.6K
active users

#WeimarRepublic

0 posts0 participants0 posts today
Replied in thread

@jrredho
#WeimarRepublic #DEhistory #ThirdReich

a🧵

This is, in principle, correct, but the context is important:

1) In a (pluralistic) #ParliamentaryDemocracy, a #CoalitionGovernment is the norm, as they reflect society much better than #WinnerTakesAll/ #FirstPastThePost systems (e. g. US, UK.)

2.) At the beginning of the #GreatDepression, in 1930, the last such government collapsed on the vital question of unemployment-insurance reform:

@realSiegfried

📰 🖥️ 📈 Excited to present at @dh2025 today with my talk “What is Democracy? Scalable Reading Newspapers of the Weimar Republic.”

My project combines digital methods and close reading to analyze how democracy was discussed in historical newspapers from Weimar Germany - a scalable-reading workflow. Looking forward to the discussion and the other talks in session "SP-34".

⏰ 4:00pm (GMT+1)
🔗 shorturl.at/4xZPv

**#DH2025 #DigitalHistory** **#DigitalHumanities** **#DH** **#WeimarRepublic**

Timely #review article:
Frank Biess, Weimar in the World: Transnational and Global Perspectives on Germany’s First Democracy, in: The Journal of Modern History 97 (2025) 2, journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/

Concluding that the “contradictory crosscurrents of Weimar’s
global situatedness sound rather familiar in the context of our own predicament at
the beginning of the twenty-first century.”

@histodons @historikerinnen

Replied in thread

@Strandjunker

#MinesotaAssasinations
#USpol

(1/2)

It might look like political assassinations. That would take the US down an even darker path, as during the #WeimarRepublic.

But is it truly as it seems?

"“Law enforcement found a hit list in the #Minnesota suspect’s car that 👉contained nearly 70 names👈, a law enforcement official briefed on the matter told CNN.

The names included abortion👉 providers, pro-abortion rights advocates, and lawmakers in...

cnn.com/us/live-news/minnesota

CNN · June 14, 2025 - News on the manhunt for gunman who shot Minnesota lawmakersBy Adrienne Vogt

So, a co-worker told me about this article today... Wow! What day are we on now?

How Hitler Dismantled a Democracy in 53 Days

He used the constitution to shatter the constitution.
By Timothy W. Ryback

"Ninety-two years ago this month, on Monday morning, January 30, 1933, Adolf Hitler was appointed the 15th chancellor of the #WeimarRepublic. In one of the most astonishing political transformations in the history of democracy, Hitler set about destroying a constitutional republic through constitutional means. What follows is a step-by-step account of how Hitler systematically disabled and then dismantled his country’s democratic structures and processes in less than two months’ time—specifically, one month, three weeks, two days, eight hours, and 40 minutes. The minutes, as we will see, mattered.

"Hans Frank served as Hitler’s private attorney and chief legal strategist in the early years of the Nazi movement. While later awaiting execution at Nuremberg for his complicity in Nazi atrocities, Frank commented on his client’s uncanny capacity for sensing 'the potential weakness inherent in every formal form of law' and then ruthlessly exploiting that weakness. Following his failed Beer Hall Putsch of November 1923, Hitler had renounced trying to overthrow the Weimar Republic by violent means but not his commitment to destroying the country’s #democratic system, a determination he reiterated in a Legalitätseid—'legality oath'—before the Constitutional Court in September 1930. Invoking Article 1 of the Weimar constitution, which stated that the government was an expression of the will of the people, Hitler informed the court that once he had achieved power through legal means, he intended to mold the government as he saw fit. It was an astonishingly brazen statement.

"'So, through constitutional means?' the presiding judge asked.

"'Jawohl!' Hitler replied."

Read more:
theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/

Archived version:
archive.ph/ylnZR
#Fascism #ResistFascism #Authoritarianism #USPol #History #HistoryRepeats #Twitler

The Atlantic · How Hitler Dismantled a Democracy in 53 DaysBy Timothy W. Ryback