Micah<p>&gt;THE YEAR OF C++ SUCCESSOR LANGUAGES</p><p><a href="https://accu.org/journals/overload/30/172/teodorescu/" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">accu.org/journals/overload/30/</span><span class="invisible">172/teodorescu/</span></a></p><p>by <span class="h-card"><a href="https://techhub.social/@LucTeo" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@<span>LucTeo</span></a></span> </p><p>I suspect by the time <a href="https://vmst.io/tags/vallang" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>vallang</span></a> gets its pants on (and hashtag!) <a href="https://vmst.io/tags/rustlang" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>rustlang</span></a> will have already killed <a href="https://vmst.io/tags/cpp" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>cpp</span></a>. </p><p>On the bright side, we all benefit from better languages, so my opinion is: may the best language win. I'm just happy people aren't ignoring performance anymore.</p>