There is an interesting case going on in Empire about "Mexico" ruling class suing Gun manufacturers in Empire about the crimes of its partners in crime i.e Drug cartels.
I went over the arguments submitted by Gun lobby (Capitalists who are there to make $ rather than actually for peasants defending themselves against bigger thugs i.e State, Capital, Fascism …). Even if they are doing the right thing (in my book its right) for wrong reasons, I will take it.
They tear into the the ruling class gangsters in "Mexico". The ruling class thugs from "Mexico" are trying to undermine peasants holding weapons in Empire.
There is a anti-gun shitllib cult thats bred by ruling class all around the world that the only "responsible" people who needs to have weapons are the worst segments of society i.e State & its goons aka organised thug of organised thieves in society. Ruling class created multiple generations of cowards who think stripping peasants of weapons (but ruling class & its goons not being stripped off them) is a "reasonable" position.
In my book, if peasants dont have weapons, the likelihood of us ever achieving Anarchy is near zero. Even with weapons, its close to zero, but without weapons, its definitely zero. Peasants might replace one hierarchical thug with another hierarchical thug i.e State if they dont have access to weapons. But they will never be able to achieve Anarchy if they dont have access to weapons.
Thats because If a revolution happens, new wanna be ruling class bribes those who have access to weapons i.e previous State goons (or) those with weapons (State goons) will declare themselves to be new masters or they decide what the future society should look like if a revolution happens.
This doesnt mean a revolution will ever happen, but if it happens, peasants having weapons is extremely important. In the pre-figuration portion of Anarchy, if peasants have access to weapons, they need to practice & keep themselves ready if revolution were to happen.
So, in my book, we just need to accept the fact that the other negative effects we are seeing are direct result of State & its organised thuggery, enabling organised thievery stripping peasants of tools of self-defense.
Besides, if the weapons are not from Empire, criminals (cartels who work with gangsters in "Mexican" state) get it from some other place. BTW, State is the biggest criminal/terrorist there is in every society — without actual competition. Running a ruiling class scam called "election" & then declaring they now have legitimacy to write "laws" & "enforce" laws is just gas-lighting by ruling class thugs but with more steps to legitimize the organised robbery.
Here are some of their arguments against Mexican gangster i.e Ruling class thug aka State.
> Mexico’s homicides increased not when the 2004 U.S. statute sunset, but when President Calderón deployed 30,000 soldiers and federal police to battle cartels, creating military confrontations and turf wars among cartels. The Mexican military’s harsh domestic law enforcement techniques, the government’s failure to prosecute violent criminals, and the government’s human rights violations have also fueled violence. The Mexican government seeks to hold Petitioners responsible for its own domestic failings.
> Mexico’s failure to prosecute violent criminals has also fostered violent crime: “the violence Mexico faces today is the cumulative effect of the state’s clear failures,” including “the state’s incapacity and unwillingness to prevent, investigate, prosecute, and punish criminal conduct.”
> “the continuous increase in homicides in Mexico” was “the lack of judicial accountability” that “has permeated Mexico for decades and provides fertile ground where criminal behaviour can flourish.”
> (“Impunity and extremely low rates of prosecution remained a problem for all crimes,” including for “government agents” who “were complicit with international criminal gangs.”).
> The Mexican government has also been accused of inciting violent reactions from cartels by committing human rights violations, including: “unlawful or arbitrary killings by police, military, and other governmental officials; forced disappearance by government agents;…violence against journalists; serious acts of government corruption[.]” Id.; see also Kloppe-Santamaria, supra (“Military and police personnel, in particular, have been accused of the abduction of thousands of people over the course of the last decade.”).
> In short, Mexico’s homicide problem stems from a culture of criminal impunity in the legal system, and a culture of extra-legal killings by the military.
Source:
https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/23/23-1141/310430/20240522135935043_23-1141%20-%20NRA%20-%20Amicus%20Brief.pdf