fosstodon.org is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
Fosstodon is an invite only Mastodon instance that is open to those who are interested in technology; particularly free & open source software. If you wish to join, contact us for an invite.

Administered by:

Server stats:

8.7K
active users

#frequentist

0 posts0 participants0 posts today
Dr Mircea Zloteanu ☀️ 🌊🌴<p><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/statstab" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>statstab</span></a> #346 Jeffreys-Lindley paradox</p><p>Thoughts: I like this short explanation of the "paradox" of why frequentist and bayesian inference can differ.</p><p><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/paradox" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>paradox</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/frequentist" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>frequentist</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/bayesian" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>bayesian</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/inference" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>inference</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/bayesfactor" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>bayesfactor</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/pvalue" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>pvalue</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/explanation" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>explanation</span></a></p><p><a href="https://michael-franke.github.io/intro-data-analysis/jeffreys-lindley-paradox.html" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">michael-franke.github.io/intro</span><span class="invisible">-data-analysis/jeffreys-lindley-paradox.html</span></a></p>
Dr Mircea Zloteanu ☀️ 🌊🌴<p><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/statstab" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>statstab</span></a> #337 Confidence intervals and tests are two sides of the same research question</p><p>Thoughts: Comment describing the connection between NHST p-values/test and Confidence Intervals (CI).</p><p><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/NHST" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>NHST</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/ConfidenceIntervals" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ConfidenceIntervals</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/pvalues" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>pvalues</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/frequentist" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>frequentist</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/estimation" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>estimation</span></a></p><p><a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00034" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.000</span><span class="invisible">34</span></a></p>
Dr Mircea Zloteanu ☀️ 🌊🌴<p><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/statstab" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>statstab</span></a> #335 Bayesian New Statistics</p><p>Thoughts: An influential paper with a great overview of different approaches to research.</p><p><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/bayesian" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>bayesian</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/nhst" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>nhst</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/nhbt" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>nhbt</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/estimation" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>estimation</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/testing" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>testing</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/frequentist" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>frequentist</span></a> <br> <a href="https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.3758/s13423-016-1221-4.pdf" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">link.springer.com/content/pdf/</span><span class="invisible">10.3758/s13423-016-1221-4.pdf</span></a></p>
Dr Mircea Zloteanu ☀️ 🌊🌴<p><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/statstab" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>statstab</span></a> #289 The meaning of significance in data testing</p><p>Thoughts: Fisherian significance testing =/= Neyman-Pearson statistical hypothesis testing. Many debates on p-values and frequentist stats are due to this confusion.</p><p><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/pvalues" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>pvalues</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/NHST" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>NHST</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/frequentist" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>frequentist</span></a></p><p><a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01293" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.012</span><span class="invisible">93</span></a></p>
Dr Mircea Zloteanu ☀️ 🌊🌴<p><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/statstab" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>statstab</span></a> #287 Dance of the p Values</p><p>Thoughts: One of my go-to demonstrations for the variability of p-values, and why they say so little about a study.</p><p><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/pvalues" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>pvalues</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/NHST" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>NHST</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/education" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>education</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/estimation" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>estimation</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/frequentist" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>frequentist</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/replication" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>replication</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/error" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>error</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/visualization" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>visualization</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/teaching" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>teaching</span></a></p><p><a href="https://youtu.be/5OL1RqHrZQ8" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="">youtu.be/5OL1RqHrZQ8</span><span class="invisible"></span></a></p>
Michael Misamore<p>People who insist that <a href="https://sigmoid.social/tags/bayesian" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>bayesian</span></a> methods are trash are just as weird as those who insist that <a href="https://sigmoid.social/tags/frequentist" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>frequentist</span></a> methods are always misleading. Stop pinning your personal identities to methods, friends.</p>
Dr Mircea Zloteanu ☀️ 🌊🌴<p><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/statstab" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>statstab</span></a> #270 Seeing Theory: Frequentist Inference</p><p>Thoughts: Are you learning about NHST? Are you a visual learner? This might be for you.</p><p><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/NHST" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>NHST</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/dataviz" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>dataviz</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/visualisation" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>visualisation</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/learning" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>learning</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/education" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>education</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/teaching" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>teaching</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/frequentist" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>frequentist</span></a></p><p><a href="https://seeing-theory.brown.edu/frequentist-inference/index.html" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">seeing-theory.brown.edu/freque</span><span class="invisible">ntist-inference/index.html</span></a></p>
Dr Mircea Zloteanu ☀️ 🌊🌴<p><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/statstab" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>statstab</span></a> #182 P-values as percentiles</p><p>Thoughts: "The percentile heuristic is a more accurate model [] for interpreting observed p-values."</p><p><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/pvalues" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>pvalues</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/frequentist" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>frequentist</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/QRPs" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>QRPs</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/stats" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>stats</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/NHST" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>NHST</span></a></p><p><a href="https://doi.org/10.3389%2Ffpsyg.2015.00341" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">doi.org/10.3389%2Ffpsyg.2015.0</span><span class="invisible">0341</span></a></p>
guyjantic has moved!<p>OK, I'm going to have to recalibrate my brain for a few weeks. </p><p>"Bayesian yacht sinking" just activates way too many nodes in my brain. </p><p>How would a Bayesian sink a yacht?</p><p>What is the most <a href="https://c.im/tags/Bayesian" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Bayesian</span></a> method of sinking a yacht? How does it differ from <a href="https://c.im/tags/Frequentist" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Frequentist</span></a> methods?</p><p>What are the yacht-sinking priors? </p><p><a href="https://c.im/tags/statistics" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>statistics</span></a> <a href="https://c.im/tags/humor" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>humor</span></a></p>
Dr Mircea Zloteanu ☀️ 🌊🌴<p><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/statstab" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>statstab</span></a> #96 Frequentist statistical inference without repeated sampling</p><p>Thoughts: Finite frequentism or Hypothetical frequentism? Which provides more insights? Should be interpret observed CIs and p-values?</p><p><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/statistics" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>statistics</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/frequentist" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>frequentist</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/probability" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>probability</span></a></p><p><a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11229-022-03560-x" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">link.springer.com/article/10.1</span><span class="invisible">007/s11229-022-03560-x</span></a></p>
Dr Mircea Zloteanu ☀️ 🌊🌴<p><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/statstab" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>statstab</span></a> #90 Improving the utility of non-significant results [...]</p><p>Thoughts: OK overview, but a fairly naive take on what to do with non-sig results. Also, plz don't just report <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/bayesfactors" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>bayesfactors</span></a> and call it a day! </p><p><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/pvalues" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>pvalues</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/NHST" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>NHST</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/frequentist" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>frequentist</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/education" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>education</span></a></p><p><a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1747938X23000830" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">sciencedirect.com/science/arti</span><span class="invisible">cle/pii/S1747938X23000830</span></a></p>
Dr Mircea Zloteanu ☀️ 🌊🌴<p><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/statstab" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>statstab</span></a> #62 Alternative for p-values [plot effects]</p><p>Thoughts: I think G-A plots are very nice and provide more info than typical bar plots. Not sure if they are exactly an "alternative" to p-values.</p><p><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/stats" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>stats</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/pvalues" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>pvalues</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/NHST" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>NHST</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/frequentist" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>frequentist</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/dataviz" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>dataviz</span></a></p><p><a href="https://thenode.biologists.com/quantification-of-differences-as-alternative-for-p-values/research/" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">thenode.biologists.com/quantif</span><span class="invisible">ication-of-differences-as-alternative-for-p-values/research/</span></a></p>
Dr Mircea Zloteanu ☀️ 🌊🌴<p><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/statstab" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>statstab</span></a> #54 Three-decision method (Tukey's sensible formulation)</p><p>Thoughts: Not sufficiently confused about what NHST is and isn't? Well, here's another version to consider.</p><p><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/stats" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>stats</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/pvalues" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>pvalues</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/NHST" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>NHST</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/frequentist" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>frequentist</span></a></p><p><a href="https://www.annualreviews.org/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-statistics-033021-111159" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">annualreviews.org/content/jour</span><span class="invisible">nals/10.1146/annurev-statistics-033021-111159</span></a></p>
Pierre-Simon Laplace<p>📢 Episode 97 with Allen Downey is out!<br>In this episode, we cover<br>- right &amp; wrong ways of looking at <a href="https://mstdn.science/tags/statistical" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>statistical</span></a> <a href="https://mstdn.science/tags/data" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>data</span></a><br>- the Overton <a href="https://mstdn.science/tags/paradox" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>paradox</span></a><br>- claims such as "<a href="https://mstdn.science/tags/Bayesian" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Bayesian</span></a> and <a href="https://mstdn.science/tags/frequentist" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>frequentist</span></a> methods often yield the same result"<br>- his new book: "Probably Overthinking it"</p><p>Tune in here:<br><a href="https://learnbayesstats.com/episode/97-probably-overthinking-statistical-paradoxes-allen-downey/" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">learnbayesstats.com/episode/97</span><span class="invisible">-probably-overthinking-statistical-paradoxes-allen-downey/</span></a></p>
Thomas<p><span class="h-card"><a href="https://scholar.social/@krysdolega" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>krysdolega</span></a></span> A <a href="https://mas.to/tags/Bayesian" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Bayesian</span></a> or a <a href="https://mas.to/tags/Pragmaticist" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Pragmaticist</span></a> will agree to the position of <a href="https://mas.to/tags/Neurath" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Neurath</span></a> as stated by <a href="https://mas.to/tags/Zolo" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Zolo</span></a>. I often see this such criticism needed when sociology and <a href="https://mas.to/tags/psychology" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>psychology</span></a> turn to a pseudo-objectivism of the <a href="https://mas.to/tags/Fisherian" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Fisherian</span></a>, <a href="https://mas.to/tags/frequentist" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>frequentist</span></a>, kind.</p>
Dr Mircea Zloteanu ☀️ 🌊🌴<p><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/stats" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>stats</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/statstodon" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>statstodon</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/statschat" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>statschat</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/frequentist" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>frequentist</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/NHST" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>NHST</span></a><br>Considering the concept of severe testing (Mayo), is there any point in planning for or running an hypothesis test if I instead determine my SESOI or predict a range of effects (e.g., 0.2&lt;d&lt;1.0)?</p><p>Shouldn't I just pre-register an equivalence test with those bounds, and avoid the "null hypothesis" test completely?</p>
katch wreck<p>`2016 Naaman, "Almost sure hypothesis testing and a resolution of the Jeffreys-Lindley paradox"` <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/stats" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>stats</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/statistics" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>statistics</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/bayesian" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>bayesian</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/frequentist" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>frequentist</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/hypothesis" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>hypothesis</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/testing" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>testing</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/experiments" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>experiments</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/science" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>science</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/quantitative" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>quantitative</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/methods" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>methods</span></a> </p><p><a href="https://projecteuclid.org/journals/electronic-journal-of-statistics/volume-10/issue-1/Almost-sure-hypothesis-testing-and-a-resolution-of-the-Jeffreys/10.1214/16-EJS1146.full" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">projecteuclid.org/journals/ele</span><span class="invisible">ctronic-journal-of-statistics/volume-10/issue-1/Almost-sure-hypothesis-testing-and-a-resolution-of-the-Jeffreys/10.1214/16-EJS1146.full</span></a></p>
Dr Mircea Zloteanu ☀️ 🌊🌴<p>New blogpost 🚨 : What do you do if you found a significant result, but your study was underpowered? How reliable is your finding? I discuss Type M and Type S error</p><p><a href="https://mzstats.blogspot.com/2023/02/what-not-to-do-with-non-null-results.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">mzstats.blogspot.com/2023/02/w</span><span class="invisible">hat-not-to-do-with-non-null-results.html</span></a></p><p><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/statistics" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>statistics</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/frequentist" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>frequentist</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/NHST" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>NHST</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/pvalue" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>pvalue</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/sensitivityanalysis" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>sensitivityanalysis</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/falsepositiverisk" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>falsepositiverisk</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/rstats" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>rstats</span></a></p>
David Reinstein<p>This came out less bad than I thought <a href="https://nerdculture.de/tags/rapbattles" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>rapbattles</span></a> <a href="https://nerdculture.de/tags/stats" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>stats</span></a> <a href="https://nerdculture.de/tags/bayesian" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>bayesian</span></a> vs <a href="https://nerdculture.de/tags/frequentist" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>frequentist</span></a> <a href="https://nerdculture.de/tags/gpt3" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>gpt3</span></a> <a href="https://nerdculture.de/tags/farmerandthecowman" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>farmerandthecowman</span></a> <a href="https://nerdculture.de/tags/endingbeefs" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>endingbeefs</span></a></p>
Rob Aye Davies<p><span class="h-card"><a href="https://mstdn.social/@johnntowse" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>johnntowse</span></a></span> <span class="h-card"><a href="https://nerdculture.de/@dermotlynott" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>dermotlynott</span></a></span> <span class="h-card"><a href="https://nerdculture.de/@mcxfrank" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>mcxfrank</span></a></span> — we can’t just be: do we teach ANOVA or the linear model, <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/frequentist" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>frequentist</span></a> or <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/bayesian" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>bayesian</span></a>, experiment or survey? — it’s surely better to consider how can we think, write, design, collect and analyse useful evidence? nor can we just focus on analysis given the realities of complex projects, the risk of error in lab processes, data handling, and the sometimes subtle ethical questions of sharing.</p>