Dr. Moritz Lehmann<p>Battle of the giants: Nvidia <a href="https://mast.hpc.social/tags/Blackwell" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Blackwell</span></a> B200 takes the lead in FluidX3D CFD performance</p><p><a href="https://mast.hpc.social/tags/Nvidia" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Nvidia</span></a> <a href="https://mast.hpc.social/tags/B200" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>B200</span></a> just launched, and I'm one of the first people to benchmark 8x B200 via Shadeform, in a WhiteFiber server with 2x <a href="https://mast.hpc.social/tags/Intel" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Intel</span></a> <a href="https://mast.hpc.social/tags/Xeon6" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Xeon6</span></a> 6960P 72-core CPUs. 🖖😋</p><p>8x Nvidia B200 go head-to-head with 8x <a href="https://mast.hpc.social/tags/AMD" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>AMD</span></a> <a href="https://mast.hpc.social/tags/MI300X" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>MI300X</span></a> in the <a href="https://mast.hpc.social/tags/FluidX3D" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>FluidX3D</span></a> <a href="https://mast.hpc.social/tags/CFD" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>CFD</span></a> benchmark, winning overall (with FP16S storage) at 219300 MLUPs/s (~17TB/s combined VRAM bandwidth), but losing in FP32 & FP16C storage. 8x MI300X achieve 204924 MLUPs/s.</p>