Serhii Nazarovets<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://fnordon.de/@bleistifterin" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@<span>bleistifterin</span></a></span> <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://scholar.social/@Lambo" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@<span>Lambo</span></a></span> <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://nfdi.social/@NFDI" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@<span>NFDI</span></a></span> </p><p><a href="https://mstdn.science/tags/Exaly" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Exaly</span></a> is something strange and suspicious, but foremost, we must not confuse indicators and databases used to research evaluation. As an alternative to impact factors etc., I really like The Norwegian Model by Gunnar Sivertsen: <a href="https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-29016-4_7" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">link.springer.com/chapter/10.1</span><span class="invisible">007/978-3-319-29016-4_7</span></a></p>