rdm<p>I just saw a headline along the lines of "Euclid Discovers Einstein's Ring", and it got me wondering.</p><p>In the deep dark distant future, will some archaeologist or historian stumble onto this headline and, with all the evidence of reality shows, conclude that:<br>a) Euclid and Einstein were contemporaneous<br>b) In addition to being philosopher and physicist, were lovers - at least in the media<br>c) Either Einstein proposed marriage OR was unfaithfully planning to propose to someone else.</p><p>But that would be all too silly to contemplate, right?</p><p>(Looks at grave with two female skeletons intertwined. "They must have been sisters or close friends.")</p><p>Right??</p><p>(Looks at grave with female skeleton in full armour. "He was a mighty warrior.")</p><p>Umm...</p><p><a href="https://aus.social/tags/archaeology" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>archaeology</span></a> <a href="https://aus.social/tags/history" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>history</span></a> <a href="https://aus.social/tags/HahaOnlySerious" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>HahaOnlySerious</span></a> <a href="https://aus.social/tags/Euclid" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Euclid</span></a> <a href="https://aus.social/tags/Einstein" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Einstein</span></a> <a href="https://aus.social/tags/Bias" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Bias</span></a></p>