Why are there people even working on creating which would infinite surpass human capabilities? I didn't vote for any of that! But because of these people, we all would have to take the consequences if it goes wrong. And there are really people like who think the solution is merging with

It would be digital created and needed to fed information. What if it knew all of our internet activities, and browsing history, what could possibly go wrong? We need this conversation!

@tinfoil_hat as soon as I read your message, I started writing. As soon as I realized I didn't have enough characters, I got out of bed and wrote you a blog post :)

yarmo.eu/blog/ai-vs-human

TLDR what you're afraid of, cannot happen. Not in our lifetimes, and probably a whole lot longer after that.

If anything is not clear, please ask. I'm passionate about artificial intelligence and also studied brains for 9 years and did a PhD on the fastest neurons in our brain: the medial superior olive :)

@yarmo I read trough it and some things bother me about it:
1) I learned that humans can't use all their brain capacity in fact just some of it. But the AI can do that.
2) Good AI's run on supercomputers (whatson, stockmarket AIs etc. you can't compare their capabillities to normal computers see next
3) there's Uni courses about writing an AI so it would be peossible for an individual or a group to let it off the internet / botnet what would stop some madass to push "the red button" on purpose

@tinfoil_hat

1) Remember how I said I'm not stubborn? Forget that just for this message 😅 sorry… But seriously. We have to stop spreading this falsehood. You my friend are using 100% of your brain. Brain is 2% of body mass, 20% of energy consumption, highest of all organs. If any part of your brain was superfluous, it would not exist to save energy. There was a study back in the day that claimed the "10% brain use" but my scientists have shown it to be flawed and with wrong conclusions.

@tinfoil_hat "but AI can do that". Well, yeah! If AI doesn't use 100% of intelligence, the programmer is bad at their job 😅

But for me, it's like saying "the F1 car only drives at 10% speed, the scooter drives at 100% speed". Well, the F1 would still be faster.

You know what I'm saying? Even if the 10% is true (which it isn't!), so what? We need to think and discuss more about what AI currently can do. Spoiler: AI is really not as advanced as news media make you believe it is…

@yarmo " AI is really not as advanced as news media make you believe it is…"

When I can see, that Ai generated timelines can hook so many people on their platform, I must think of it beeing even more advanced than we have been told

Follow

@tinfoil_hat I have a question: what are you exactly afraid of? AI evolving to become smarter and kill us? Existing AI to ruin our lives in more ways? Or even AI being harmless but just becoming more intelligent than we are which is also threatening?

@yarmo I have read trough this article alignmentforum.org/posts/6DuJx

I can't draw all information from this article due to my lack of knowledge in this topic, but what I could extract, is very concerning

@tinfoil_hat I like that article, thanks for the link! I will read later but I already agree: AI would want full domination to best do their task. But so do humans. Difference is: humans can have power and exert domination. But you need abstract thinking. (Current) AI can not do that. Computers and CPU are incapable of the thing you are afraid of. It's a technical limitation. Personally, I am absolutely not afraid of that.

@yarmo that could be to problem tough, if it can't abstract, it could be even more recless like a train that goes in one direction no matter what consequences

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Fosstodon

Fosstodon is an English speaking Mastodon instance that is open to anyone who is interested in technology; particularly free & open source software.