@sir RISC-V is great and all, but it's (intentionally) not a complete spec. It was designed so you could make some real innovative stuff.

To make RISC-V processors that can go toe to toe with x86 and ARM, there needs to be an additional spec that standardizes RISC-V for general purpose processors.

Maybe that will happen as someone starts making successful RISC-V processors, becoming the de-facto standard, maybe it'll be set by a standards body. Either way it still needs to be done.

@urusan @sir what about PowerPC? IBM just released their POWER10 architecture, but their POWER9 architecture isn't a slouch either.

@urusan @sir
It being commercially viable will be a thing. The fact that Nvidia is going to compete against Intel and AMD means that this platform will get some nice monies for PR and R&D.

@sacha @sir I'm not doubting the eventual viability of RISC-V, I'm just pointing out that the road to a standardized RISC-V competitor to x86 and ARM is still pretty long.

For instance, check out this news article:

SiFive appears to be the chip engineering wing of the RISC-V Foundation, with one of the founders being the chairman of the RISC-V Foundation.

It is good to see that they are serious about creating the standard extensions required.

@sacha @sir It should be noted that RVV isn't at version 1.0 yet, so these first processors will probably be obsolete in a few years, when they aren't following the 1.0 spec. Either that or 1.0 will be tied to their release, since these two groups are so closely related.

Sign in to participate in the conversation

Fosstodon is an English speaking Mastodon instance that is open to anyone who is interested in technology; particularly free & open source software.