@ryan659 Yes. That's for sure. Web browsers have grown into a rich client platform. There's a bunch of reasons for that, some better than others. Choice of technology aside, I still wonder whether this is all bad.
@z428 Web browsers have been on (then-) current platforms since the web has existed. But in that time the performance demands for web browsing have increased significantly. Does someone really need to write an application in the web, likely only optimised for one web browser (Chrome..) with relatively high resource requirements compared to a native application which doesn't need anywhere near as many features as a web browser provide?
@ryan659 (Bottom line: Why didn't we manage to come up with something that is same as straightforward and easy to handle for a developer but less resource-hungry than current browser implementations...?)
@z428 The problem is how all-encompassing browsers have become. Do we really need 3D graphics, gamepad support in a browser? Push notifications? WebUSB?
@ryan659 I agree with you. But the point is: What else should they choose, given tight budgets (especially in terms of time), limited amount of devs at hand and a wide range of platforms and devices to support...? Would they have any *better* choice at the moment? I doubt so; everything else is way more tied to a particular platform and leaves some aspects well-addressed in a web browser (notifications / communication ...) unaddressed. 😐
@z428 This is true, I suppose. It does mean we need to find something that isn't trying to morph what was originally a document format (HTML is just markup, ultimately) into something it just isn't. Maybe some day it will appear, but for now it just seems that turning one thing into something else isn't the best way forward.
@ryan659 I agree, yet it seems to boil down to three basic options: (a) We accept web browsers to be used as cross-platform, cross-device, cross-network rich client platform and try to make it as good and efficient as it can be. (b) We despise web browsers being used that way and come up with a much better solution that manages to attract a really "critical" mass of developers and users really quickly. Or (c) we keep living in the world how it "used to be" and accept that a vast ...
@ryan659 ... majority of people (devs and users alike) couldn't care less. (b) would be my favourite approach, unfortunately, here, even Google as large as it is has pretty much failed (Dart). FLOSS community will be even less able to do so. Which essentially leaves us with (a) and (c) to choose... 😉 What would be your suggestion?
@z428 I do agree with you. As much as I'd prefer it be otherwise, but at present a better solution does not exist.
@ryan659 Yes. And sometimes it's a bit confusing/frustrating: I see a lot of effort being put into making browsers more "lightweight" to adhere to that "old" understanding of the web being hyperlinked documents, but I see very few (no?) effort put into trying to provide an alternative to the browser for what it's mostly used right now - a rich client application development platform. 😟
Fosstodon is an English speaking Mastodon instance that is open to anyone who is interested in technology; particularly free & open source software.