fosstodon.org is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
Fosstodon is an invite only Mastodon instance that is open to those who are interested in technology; particularly free & open source software. If you wish to join, contact us for an invite.

Administered by:

Server stats:

10K
active users

Should we migrate the communication platforms of our FOSS projects (e.g., Python, Django, …) to Matrix? 🗳️

The idea of ​​avoiding the vendor lock-in is increasingly widespread 🔓

Migrate social networks to the Fediverse, self-host your blog, regain control of your Git repository, … 👏

I wonder if it's time to migrate to “an open network for secure, decentralized communication” 🪐

Answer here or share your experience 👇

CC @matrix

@paulox @matrix great topic! btw gitter.im/ is run by Matrix. So I think a lot of people are already using Matrix without fully realizing it.

For me, the answer is "gradually" and I agree that other platforms like Zulip and Discourse are necessary to take into the picture.

Regardless, the community risks more fragmentation. But I don't think that just jumping into it and starting a Matrix server is the answer, it requires some support, facilitation and planning.

gitter.imGitter — Where developers come to talk.

@benjaoming @matrix Thanks Benjamin. I totally agree that a plan is needed. Do you think you would be interested to participate in a future working group on this topic?

@benjaoming @paulox @matrix If we're talking about the Django community in terms of a working group, then future community platforms will be covered by the Online Working Group proposal here (github.com/django/dsf-working-)

I would be very happy to have more of the community involved.

Although I think there is plenty we can do before moving to new platforms, but making a plan is no bad thing either.

GitHubOnline Community Working Group by nanorepublica · Pull Request #23 · django/dsf-working-groupsBy nanorepublica

@nanorepublica wow I really have to watch that repo for activity... so easy to do. Anyways, so great to see this take shape! @paulox is this the initiative you had in mind?

Paolo Melchiorre

@benjaoming @nanorepublica I didn't have anything specific in mind but it seems that sharing the idea in the Fediverse seems to have been a good idea. This working group seems on topic. Do you think you could help?

@paulox @benjaoming

It would be a long term plan. There are plenty of smaller/easier things that could be achieved first to improve the community.

That said, knowing which would be the preferred platform, if Discord ever did do something we took issue with, would be an excellent idea.

Right now, moving for the sake of moving is not high on my list.

@nanorepublica @paulox I need to stick to my commitments to the Social Media WG I wouldn't mind working a proposal for Matrix, but I could imagine it would be more timely once the Online Community WG has been established so it can align.

🦆 I think the Fediverse works incredibly well, and we could probably do more, given the capabilities of self-hosting, ActivityPub etc... feels like there's more potential buried. @anze3db is really great at showing the way with fedidevs.com/

fedidevs.comAwesome accounts on MastodonMastodon, European Commission, SwiftOnSecurity, BrianKrebs, nixCraft 🐧, and more.

@nanorepublica @paulox haha, just noticed this: By "it can align", I mean that a Matrix proposal can align itself to the new Online Community WG's inputs and agenda... not the other way around 🤪