Funny thing is that people assume that tracking only happens over the web, in their browsers.
While Microsoft and company have been doing it for ages in their operating systems and office suites, many didn't think that some of the console tools they use did the same.
Here is why I am very hesitant about adopting new and flashy systems. You can't trust them.
It's frightening how much data is collected, even by trusted tools. Tools that should be "offline" will often hoover up data just because and ship it off at the first sign of network connectivity.
I think because we don't get to see *how much* data is actually collected, we're more apt to be casual about it.
Having looked at some of the private telemetry data from O365, it's *a lot*.
Your company knows when you're (not) working. Down to the minute.
@nathand Unlike many products, though, they're giving you the option to say no. I've also seen some software which make "no telemetry" the default.
@binyamin Sure, it's better than nothing. I don't debate that.
What I have at issue here is that they do ✨ "telemetry" ✨ *at all*. Tools that are designed to do a thing are now, in greater number, phoning home for *no good reason*.
Data on where, when, why or how I use, or even who I used it with does not belong to the developer. It belongs to me. If you need to find out the software is used: Ask.
If I give you something, you shouldn't have to be paranoid that it's reporting its usage to me.
@nathand this is a bad idea and also already illegal in EU.
Any telemetry gathering (because let's face it - even if it doesn't have its own UID they can check the src IP) should be opt-in only.
If you'd like or "need" information on usage. Ask. If someone is unwilling to give you information, respect that. These are basic social decency things that organizations seem to ignore (for money).
Fosstodon is an English speaking Mastodon instance that is open to anyone who is interested in technology; particularly free & open source software.