There is lots to criticize about the web as it currently is.

But without it we'd be completely beholden to Apple's App Store and Google Play to share interactive experiences (apps, whatever...) with all the other users of the world.

So unless you only care to cater to the extremely small minority of users who side-load on Android, the web, with all its warts, is the way to go.

Embrace it.


this sounds strangely as if nobody has desktop computers

I guess every loophole I can find for a mobile computer involves using a 'different app' to distribute things for, so the premise remains true.

but I think the actual finding here is 'mobile OSs aren't flexible enough to let you decide what you want to create/view instead of centring everything on applications and making you coerce it into the application's paradigm', 'thus Online Javascript is the only App like that'

@Valenoern yes sure I did not mention desktops. But here's the thing:

- Widely used desktops are probably headed for the same closed model as mobile OS. I lost the reference but I think the new M1 Macs have additional restrictions on what software you can run on them.

- Desktops aren't a replacement for mobile, and mobile is more and more the most common if not only computer users touch routinely.


@teleclimber @Valenoern That's an interesting take. About Apple I know almost nothing, but one major selling point of both Android and Windows is the large amount of software that runs on them. In that respect, Linux would love to be where Windows is today, with all that software and device-support. For Microsoft to throw away that advantage would really cost them. What's their motivation: data-gathering? Security? Governmental pressure? Suppressing rival software houses?

@markusl @Valenoern It's possible MS takes a different approach than Apple. That could be really good. And they might do it. They've already surprised us (or me at least) with WSL for example. They could decide to differentiate from Apple by going the other way, or they'll chicken out and follow Apple because they're scared of being different. It'll probably depend on who is running MS in a few years.

As for motivation it's all about control so they can capture more value and make more 💰

@teleclimber @Valenoern Thanks, Olivier. That's interesting. I can see why a company wanting to offer a better, safer experience than is available on Windows would lock down its machines, but I also see that it makes these machines less free. Individual users can opt into Apple's ecosystem or opt out of it, but the bigger question to me is whether Apple's actions will encourage other platforms to move in a similar direction.

Sign in to participate in the conversation

Fosstodon is an English speaking Mastodon instance that is open to anyone who is interested in technology; particularly free & open source software.