@vete @lbetson There was a time they did but that was a long time ago.

@cabellocarlos @alex @dredstrauss @lbetson
Thanks. Good to know. I left FF long ago, however.

@jrmyj @cabellocarlos @dredstrauss @lbetson This is surprisingly not bad. I mean remove "deplatforming" part completely and these requirements for huge centralized platforms make sense.

@alex @jrmyj @cabellocarlos @lbetson isn't Mozilla referring to big media/social companies such as Facebook or public entities? I think that privacy for the individual is key, but big advertising platforms (FB) or government entities should be extremely controlled and supervised in benefit of the people 🤔

The headline might or might not be representing accurately Mozilla's position on deplatforming.

It's not clear to me if they are advocating for ADDITIONAL measures to deplatforming or INSTEAD of deplatforming; The use of the word "more" in the headline is ambigous.

Suggesting only further transparency on the display hierarchy and source of their contents would be far less controversial.
@alex @jrmyj @dredstrauss @lbetson

ambiguous*.

There's probably more typos there.

@jrmyj @cabellocarlos @dredstrauss @lbetson Yes, this is what I didn't like as well. The article itself isn't about deplatforming at all but headline suggests they highly approve it and want more of it.