@kev We did it first, and better
@sirikon that’s true. I much prefer Mastodon’s approach. If I didn’t want someone to reply, why would I want them to see the tweet in the first place?
Nope, Mastodon's implementation of direct toots is much better. Direct toots in Mastodon are only visible to those mentioned in toot.
Twitter's implementation doesn't change who can see a direct tweet. Anyone can see and like while only those mentioned can reply.
Twitter's implementation is an amazing opportunity for fake news spreaders since they can mention themselves and nobody can reply and correct their fake news.
Twitter without this new feature will be the better Twitter.
@kev Does it? Can you make a public post but restrict who is allowed to reply to it?
@stevenroose no idea, I’m not a big twitter user really.
@stevenroose ohhh ok. Yeah, but if only certain people can see the post, only they can reply.
@kev Yeah but it's a different use case. On big platforms like Twitter, when a few people have a conversation --that they want to be public-- they get overloaded by trolls. So this feature is actually useful IMO.
Twitter has become a platform for famous people to challenge each other in the face of the public.
Of course you can get similar results to ask your clients to hide all posts from people you're not connected with by degree 2 or 3 or so.
Fosstodon is an English speaking Mastodon instance that is open to anyone who is interested in technology; particularly free & open source software.