@ParadeGrotesque "However, several sources have confirmed that the organization is sound financially, and the layoffs were part of a restructuring of its core business, with Mozilla moving away from its current role of internet standards steward and experimental approach to its product catalog to more commercially-viable offerings that generate revenues on their own."
This from the link you pasted. So sounds like it has nothing to do with budget, but rather changing priorities.
Let me ask you: why is a non-profit organization trying to sell commercial products?
This is a *non* *profit*for Pete's sake. They are moving away from what they are supposed to do!
@ParadeGrotesque that's a fair question to ask, and not one I know the answer to.
Your assertion in OP though is misleading and dangerous for Mozilla in the long run.
How is it misleading? 400M$ per year should be enough to cover Mozilla expenses.
I *know* there are some incredibly important non profit orgs running on much less per year.
For instance, Amnesty international, which is a huge org, has a budget of +/- 300M$ per year. And they do a lot more in the real world, while Mozilla work (while important) is entirely "virtual".
My point is the following: Mozilla does not have to fire anyone. This is bad management, pure and simple.
@ParadeGrotesque read the quote again. It's not a matter of covering expenses, but where those expenses go.
The commercial arm which raises unrestricted income to support the non-profit is a common model - amnesty etc will have this too. I agree completely that they do have loads of money.
It's frustrating that their commercial activity doesnt seem to be targeted at diversifying away from that Google money. Never has been from what I've seen.
Fosstodon is an English speaking Mastodon instance that is open to anyone who is interested in technology; particularly free & open source software.