Follow
Apparently I'm living in 1995 for not wanting an RGB puke show in my terminal emulator. Since when is it wrong (or not enough) with using the standard 16 colours?
@metalune I agree. :)
@Metruzanca @hund *cries in fear of fbterm getting depreceated*
@Metruzanca @hund what does dis do?
@metalune @hund it's a very nice terminal emulator. Go check it out https://github.com/alacritty/alacritty
@hund i just enabled 16 bit color in my terminal emulator. It’s nice to be able to match color schemes elsewhere like in text editors and so forth
@patcoll Who has time for that? :P
@hund
@metalune
@Metruzanca
@patcoll
I'm generally OK as long as there are at least 2 (preferably contrasting) colours in my terminal emulator :)
@metalune
@Metruzanca
@patcoll
I'm generally OK as long as there are at least 2 (preferably contrasting) colours in my terminal emulator :)
@Jase @Metruzanca @patcoll @hund lmao, I love the "preferably contrasting" black on #000001 go brrrrrrr
@hund I mean.. I like having 256-color support because it allows me to show *different* colors, I don't necessarily need more than 16 tho