@robert I quite like this article on the situation as a whole:
@freddy Wonderful article and I love the simple mechanisms to convey the point. Sadly, I’m not sure the argument holds water. Even if I am a fully paid up supporter of E2EE.
In the wonderful book Spycatcher by Peter Wright, the former spy master outlines many of the technological tricks of the trade used to intercept that which people seek to remain private or even secret. Such as banks of special kettles used to steam open envelopes.
@freddy In that context, the Security Services will always seek updated kettles. But I think the Home Secretary should let the Service get on and do what they do, spying in the particular (targeting of a specific suspect) rather than seeking to allow spying in the general (targeting of us all).
It’s the only thing that separates a free democracy from a totalitarian state. Something which is under as much threat in Australia as in the UK.
@robert states will spy on each other and their own, if you take a realist world view.
There is nothing inherently wrong with this. There are obvious security reasons to want to spy on someone/thing.
But Patel wants to take it a step further. As you say, she wants to target specific suspects rather than the general population. Patel's acts are a dangerous step in a troubling direction for the UK.
Fosstodon is an English speaking Mastodon instance that is open to anyone who is interested in technology; particularly free & open source software.