Lisp is not an acceptable Lisp:

I mean, it's true, but here I am in 2017-2019 finally getting a handle on doing productive stuff in Common Lisp.


>Lisp is not an acceptable Lisp:

Interesting read. But

> At the risk of predicting future fashion trends, which is rarely a good idea, I'll venture that objects are going to continue to be trendy for at least a few more decades.

Didn't really turn out right, did it? (Though in fairness, he did say making that prediction wasn't a good idea)

@codesections @gcupc

Objects are such an easy abstraction to wrap our heads that the first time I read “move beyond OO” I thought “Heresy!”

Fortunately I kept reading and see the point but I imagine it’s a hard sell for lots of people.

@mkb @gcupc

> I imagine [moving away from Object Oriented Programming is] a hard sell for lots of people.

Yeah, I certainly don't think OOP is going away any time soon—both because, as you say, it's a hard sell to lots of folks and because OOP really *is* the right abstraction for some problem spaces.

But, if we're talking about what's "trendy" in programming (as the 2006 post was), then I think the time of OOP being trendy is well in the past

Sign in to participate in the conversation

Fosstodon is an English speaking Mastodon instance that is open to anyone who is interested in technology; particularly free & open source software.