There's a discussion going on about whether the Fediverse should set up a governance structure to decide its future

I think that the Fediverse should be governed as a co-operative ! I don't think it makes sense to govern a decentralised network with a centralised hierarchy ?

@calum I don't see much reason in it given that instances already have the ability to decide who they want to connect with or not.
This is as good as it gets, I prefer to keep it fully decentralized. Governing is the very reason some of us have moved away from other socials.

@renniezen I like that instances have power of who they connect with, but there is a measurable tendency towards centralisation:

e.g. Amazon hosted only 6% of instances but 30% of users

93.66% of instances were hosted in 5 countries

I don't think that organising == being governed by someone else. A good co-operative (I think) is a means of self-governing

@calum @renniezen

The title of the #SocialHub topic is a bit unfortunate. Because the discussion was not about a governing body, but on the need to coordinate / collaborate otherwise very fragmented activities that are inhibiting the evolution of the #activitypub et al standards.. i.e. the tech foundation of #fediverse

This might be via a foundation that involves in 1) documentation / housekeeping 2) community building 3) advocacy and a common voice to the outside world.

@calum @renniezen

The community work costs tremendous amount of time and effort, which no one really can / will provide. For this reason the foundation might be donation-funded to compensate those involved and to maybe have e.g. some bounty funding on open issues. And this was where voting rights and governance came into the discussion.


What would a government censorship mechanism for the fediverse look like?

Like this.

Sign in to participate in the conversation

Fosstodon is an English speaking Mastodon instance that is open to anyone who is interested in technology; particularly free & open source software.