Follow

This part of the Rust language kinda seems more verbose than realistically necessary.

Seems like it would be better to make a pecking order for where 'use' statements look for modules in, rather than having to have a file that is the same name as the folder you're referring to...

doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch07-05

@brandon im not sure if im understanding your proposition correctly, but i like the explicitness. if, for example, im forking a library and im looking for a function definition, i know that there will be a `use` at the top that tells me where i can find it, or at least where i can find the next `use` in the stream.

@brandon or wait, are you talking about how you have to make `front_of_house.rs` with `pub use mod hosting` in it? because you can alrernatively have a `mod.rs` inside the `front_of_house` directory with the same contents instead

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Fosstodon

Fosstodon is an English speaking Mastodon instance that is open to anyone who is interested in technology; particularly free & open source software.