Free software folks wouldn't even be happy if Microsoft shared the source for their entire software library.
@brandon: Probably not, but it's a step
@brandon microsoft is a virus.😃
@brandon So I think a niche group (like reactOS) would jump on it, and some of the advantages windows does have would see some adaption for other options, and eventually it would be appreciated.
@brandon yeah, transparent code is just one element.
@brandon Honestly, I would be as excited to use Windows as I am to use Android, in that case. It's a good platform in terms of software support, it has a couple interesting quirks to it, and it can now be better sanitized and examined to not act maliciously.
Nope. Opening the source doesn't make it free software.
Obviously not, but I that wasn't the point I was trying to make
But its the point I'm trying to make. Big difference between open source and truly free, and that distinction is paramount on my list of priorities.
@brandon Knowing the source code for malware wont suddenly make it not malware.
No but it can help people become cognizant that that piece of software is indeed actually malware
Fosstodon is a Mastodon instance that is open to anyone who is interested in technology; particularly free & open source software.