as a verb
At the moment, because of their cool "we'll fab 130mm chips for you" thing, I'm kind of supporting them now – still fighting against stuff like the ads and analytics and AMP, but right now I don't think they deserve to lose their *name*. (That'll probably change next time they do something bad.)
@wizzwizz4 Good point with the "genericide" 😃
It's not that I want them to lose their name, but being more selective with our language would help reduce their normalized monopoly.
@arran on the one hand, im inclined to agree
on the other, i still hope for the days of
"where did u google that, Bing or DDG?"
@carcinopithecus What a terrible sentence 😂
The virgin "Googling" vs the Chad "Searxing" haha
@arran I still can't get to using 'duckduckgoing' (duckduckwent, duckduckgone?) :D
@ton I have too, tried and failed with this approach :p
Although duckduckgone has a ring to it!
I've resorted to.. "search" 😉
@arran 'search', mmm, there might be something to that. Has a familiar ring even..... ;)
@arran I like using it as a verb, it hurts their trademark
@arran too late. It'll stick for a while, like "to xerox" something
I just use "search it online". It's totally neutral and everyone understands it. "duckduckgo it" sounds too weird and nerdy to avarage people IMO
@vitSkalicky Agreed - I think sticking neutral is the way to go here too. Selecting another company to use as a verb only perpetuates the problem. Love DDG, naturally - But things can change.
@arran I often write it as "google" or "googling," without giving it the honor of an uppercased initial, which to me feels like stealing a trademarked word from bigcorp and using it as everyday lingo.
(of course it gets edited to "Google" or "searched" by others reviewing my work, but still)
Fosstodon is an English speaking Mastodon instance that is open to anyone who is interested in technology; particularly free & open source software.