I almost got into a conversation with an Arch user who hadn't updated his system in a year and was remarkably proud of this fact. He was about to begin the update. I was tempted to stick around and watch the disaster unfold but decided against. I can't believe anyone wouldn't update their Arch install in a year. Remember folks, these people walk amongst us, they express opinionsand can vote. Scary shit. #arch



What is even the point of being on Arch then ? Isn't being on the bleeding edge kind of one of the main draws of Arch ?

@PublicNuisance @Schlumpf23 I have done this and it has gone fine... It was on a machine I hadn't needed for a while. I don't understand why rolling release has a rep of being unstable...


Oh I agree about the rep. I've run Manjaro; Solus and OpenSuse Tumbleweed and never had any more issues than Mint gave me. Which is to say all have been mostly smooth sailing.

@shellkr @PublicNuisance
I don't either. I've been using Arch for 9yrs and any disasters I've had have been my faults experimenting. Honestly, Arch once properly maintained is one of the most stable distros going.

@PublicNuisance Absolutely. I try to update at least once a day depending on what the updates are and what I'm using for my system for, i.e.writing etc. It's the whole point of a bleeding edge for otherwise something like Debian sounds more suitable to that particular user.

@PublicNuisance I don't know. Yup, being on the bleeding edge is the exact point of being on Arch is remarkably stable when taken care of properly.

Sign in to participate in the conversation

Fosstodon is an English speaking Mastodon instance that is open to anyone who is interested in technology; particularly free & open source software.