fosstodon.org is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
Fosstodon is an invite only Mastodon instance that is open to those who are interested in technology; particularly free & open source software. If you wish to join, contact us for an invite.

Administered by:

Server stats:

10K
active users

Friday night?

Perfect time to drop a blog post that might sound like clickbait, but that I genuinely hope can help forge a path forward while making everyone happy—or at least pissing everyone off equally (sometimes the best you can ask for!)

cassidyjames.com/blog/gnome-fo

Edit: lol it’s Thursday night. I should go to bed.

Edit ×2: comments enabled; reply publicly here and it’ll show on the post as well. ✨

Edit ×3: I’ve revised the post based on feedback

Cassidy James BlaedeGNOME Should Kick the Foot to the Curb… Mostly
More from Cassidy James :eos: :gg: :fh:

@cassidy My issue with this is that by "professionalizing" it like this, you've essentially gutted any visibility of the community that the project actually *is*.

Admittedly, I'm not a real GNOME person even though I've contributed a little bit to GNOME, but I used to be a heavy GNOME user. In general, I think giving up the "personality" of projects and communities leads to strictly worse products and services.

@cassidy Yes, I did. I'm specifically responding that it's a bad idea to eliminate this from user-facing aspects of the project, product, and services.

(As an aside, I definitely do not appreciate the assumption that I did not read the blog post before commenting. You know me better than that.)

@Conan_Kudo the foot is quirky—and actively hard to work with. Rather than use a logo at all, we've repeatedly seen it just completely dropped from spaces _anyway_.

Instead, I'm proposing we come up with something better, even if whimsical and quirky, but that actually works in the contexts we need to use it.

I don’t think any of the modern GNOME design work has been “giving up the ‘personality’ of projects and communities.” In fact, quite the opposite as I feel like GNOME’s is strongest now.

Neal Gompa (ニール・ゴンパ) :fedora:

@cassidy The implication in your blog post is that it has to be different from the foot. What I'm saying is that we should explicitly not do that. A new iteration of the foot is fine, eliminating the foot is what I take issue with.

Fedora went through a similar process a few years ago. A lot of effort was made to ensure we retained all the important aspects of the Fedora infinity logo iconography in the new one.

A new GNOME logo mark should go along the same vein.