Hey, I'm planning to make an official package of . Is it a good idea? It would be not if the game is unplayable and/or is going to change much in the future which would break savegames.

@AMDmi3 In the future, that would be awesome! Right now it's not suitable for distribution (I can't guarantee the save file). Is there already a Solarus package on FreeBSD? VOADI is just data files for Solarus, eg you run it with `solarus-run ~/path/to/voadi` (solarus-run is the compiled Solarus engine)

Yes, Solarus package is already there. I know voadi is just a data, but it doesn't make it less meaningful to package it, because of one command standard installation for a user, update and dependency tracking, installing .desktop file etc. IMO you should get prepared as it'll get packaged by other people anyway as the word spreads, which is not a bad thing really.

@AMDmi3 I completely agree! VOADI requires Solarus 1.6, is the FreeBSD package up to date?

I would very much like VOADI to be a first-class citizen of FreeBSD and didn't mean to imply otherwise. There's an open issue for .desktop etc here: gitlab.com/voadi/voadi/issues/

@voadi I'm a bit confused because before you said it's not suitable for distribution. However I don't see anything really holding it, especially you also have bounty for providing a flatpak.

I just want to understand what'll happen to saves after the game is updated, so I could write a proper notification to package users. May a new version crash on old saves, or will they just be ignored? May they get corrupted, or will still work with a version they were created with?

@AMDmi3 Sorry for the miscommunication. The answer is "it's unplayable," but I got caught up with the semantics. It would be really great to see it added to FreeBSD when it's done.

Sign in to participate in the conversation

Fosstodon is a Mastodon instance that is open to anyone who is interested in technology; particularly free & open source software.