Hey, I'm planning to make an official package of . Is it a good idea? It would be not if the game is unplayable and/or is going to change much in the future which would break savegames.

@AMDmi3 In the future, that would be awesome! Right now it's not suitable for distribution (I can't guarantee the save file). Is there already a Solarus package on FreeBSD? VOADI is just data files for Solarus, eg you run it with `solarus-run ~/path/to/voadi` (solarus-run is the compiled Solarus engine)

Yes, Solarus package is already there. I know voadi is just a data, but it doesn't make it less meaningful to package it, because of one command standard installation for a user, update and dependency tracking, installing .desktop file etc. IMO you should get prepared as it'll get packaged by other people anyway as the word spreads, which is not a bad thing really.

@AMDmi3 I completely agree! VOADI requires Solarus 1.6, is the FreeBSD package up to date?

I would very much like VOADI to be a first-class citizen of FreeBSD and didn't mean to imply otherwise. There's an open issue for .desktop etc here: gitlab.com/voadi/voadi/issues/

@voadi I'm a bit confused because before you said it's not suitable for distribution. However I don't see anything really holding it, especially you also have bounty for providing a flatpak.

I just want to understand what'll happen to saves after the game is updated, so I could write a proper notification to package users. May a new version crash on old saves, or will they just be ignored? May they get corrupted, or will still work with a version they were created with?

@AMDmi3 Sorry for the miscommunication. The answer is "it's unplayable," but I got caught up with the semantics. It would be really great to see it added to FreeBSD when it's done.

Sign in to participate in the conversation

Fosstodon is an English speaking Mastodon instance that is open to anyone who is interested in technology; particularly free & open source software.